Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

Started by giantkiller, September 22, 2007, 12:39:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

Feynman

Hey guys...

Jon just sent me this graph of his TPU resonance, I think he is heterodyning two frequencies.  I thought the graph was fascinating, so I'd figure I'd post it!!


Jon

@Loner

The blip at the 256 value was a measurement error. Thoes happen every once in a while.

The graph is a plot of the output from my 6" TPU with two frequencies. The first was set at the value 125 and the second frequency sweeps through the spectrum. The First frequency was set at a peak output from sweeping a single frequency.

The values DR stand for dIgital resistor. They are the absolute values sent to the chips. The Khz value is my estimated frequency from samples i took on my scope.

A still have to do more tests but noticed that the output from two frequencies is random probably because the phase is not controlled between the two. The output was very flickery through the whole spectrum.

I am trying to sort out what is happening as the power is being transmitted using these high frequencies. I have yet to measure the current flow going to the controll coils. It doesn't behave like an EM field. The collector coils don't have to be coils they can be a wire in close proximity to the collector coil. The output of the collector coil also doesn't have to use both wires, a single wire to two opposite diodes will produce almost as much output as both terminals.

Very interesting stuff. I will set up the tests to run longer and organize the data so I can leave it running for a week and find the maximum output frequencies.

I suspect that the phase between the frequencies is an interesting thing to experiment with but its really hard to control. The mosfets im using have a turn on/off time of 4ns, thats enough time for the electrical charge to travel at least one rotation of the toroid. I will post more results soon.


aleks

Quote from: infringer on April 08, 2008, 01:10:00 PMThis to me reminds me over superconductivity talking about slowing current....
Should be so if electron collisions are a reality. No electron collisions = no EM waves, meaning electrical current flows at the pace of electrons, not at C.
Quote from: infringer on April 08, 2008, 01:10:00 PMLaws are made to be broken.
The only "law" I would personally love to see broken is the one that dictates that gravity is caused by an unbearable concept of mass-energy.

aleks

Quote from: Loner on April 08, 2008, 01:02:36 PM
This really doesn't prove anything as far as Mag fields go in that line of reasoning, however, cause
the sun has a MUCH more powerful field and between here and the moon, the difference would
not be too great.  Also, the voyager probe did have the high-power xmitter failure to return to
operation.  Was this because of a unforseen magnetic field problem?  (It switched to backup
from human error, but couldn't be switched back......)

Thanks for the input!

aleks

Jon, are you sweeping with sine wave or square wave? If the latter, I would suggest you to sweep using sinewaves first. Sweeping with square wave produces complex results that are hard to analyze, especially if heterodyning is concerned. Heterodyning is best understood with elementary waveforms. Phase may be important if we are talking about colliding magnetic fields. If a wrong phase relationship is chosen, mag fields may not collide. For heterodyning alone phase is irrelevant.