Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

[acerzw]

A question I have is what creates the boundaries of the standing waves which make them appear as distinct objects instead of a normal wave that propagates across the entire universe... they must be contained,reflected or cancelled by something that is proportional to the size of the physically manifestation that the wave represents and a ratio of its wavelength, whatever its frequency, in order to be a standing wave? That is one part of the idea I was trying to express... the standing waves that create a physical objects manifestation do move as a whole, since the physical object can move relative to other physical objects... so the boundary must move too and therefore have some form of presence even if it is just the harmonic or unharmonic interference created by other waves... thus I believe the boundary must be an effect and therefore should have a cause...

Another point is that in modern particle physics we smash atoms against each other at high velocities and observe the fragments... but lets adopt an analogy of the particle as a crashed car... the fragments thrown off in the crash don't resemble parts of the car in its normal state... without seeing the cars true form before the crash we can only guess at its likeness from the mangled parts... not a very good way of investigating... as Dale Pond says on his SVP videos... so we may never know the cars true form for sure (we might decide it wasn't even a car)... since we can only observe by looking at the results of an energetic interaction... which changes the observed thing, since it is formed of energy itself... just as quantum physics says correctly despite being flawed in other ways... so it may not be possible for us to actually deduce reliably the makeup of the manifestations of physical objects at the very low levels... we may just end up with several models that are incompatible due to the abstract terms used to express them, but which are all consistent with the observable effects and interactions... As is said in Zen the name is not the thing... and one thing can have several names in different languages... though it would be nice if when the dust clears in the future everyone agrees to adopt the same model (not likely I suspect)...

When is a model not a model? Well possibly when its a model... you see we must not forget what Kurt Godel (a true mathematical genius) irrefutably proved... which will probably can the whole idea to a degree... since symbolic languages must always allow correctly formed statements that are contradictory and also ones that cannot be decided, both of which can only be resolved by using a language with more symbols... the expression of a complex model may have these attributes, the more complex it is the more likely it will... you could carry on expanding the symbol set ad infinitum... each model showing contradictions or phenomenon that it cannot express, which can only be solved by using a bigger symbol set... possibly Godel's idea despite being abstract itself may express the only fixed property of the universe and thus be the only 'true' natural law... all our laws could be just manifestations in themselves that can change... an infinitely evolving (yet timeless) creation... after all does God the Universal Conscious Energy have limits on what can be created... you would like to think not... which implies Infinitely Indeterminable Determinism! Which sounds like the most fun to me, no true limits (or just infinitely changing ones)... which is perhaps the simplest solution to the problem... you just got to keep doggy paddling... so could any idea I propose be viewed within this non-contextual context?   ermm... that question was non-decidable since it contained a contradiction... look if I resorted to a language with a larger set of symbols I could explain this better... within limits... oh damn, this is getting needlessly recursive... you get the idea!

(This assumes that our Universal God, is not just a part of a larger scheme... like a small part of a fractal, which is a fundamental property of nature as we all know! A pretty mind blowing existential phenomenology in all.)

Note all this does not stop our models being useful... it just means perhaps they will never be complete and can never be a true reflection of reality, since they are only abstract expressions of ideas about it... they can never be it...  as apples are not oranges...

Ho Hum... In a universe like this you don't need drugs to get high or have fun  (though this post might make more sense)

A

P.S. I need to buy Atomic Suicide by Russell also as he updated ideas from The Universal One in that book... so I will not be up to speed for a while...

[giantkiller]

Thought I would start out the new year with a tribute to David Hamel.
He recently passed away.
His exploits and Muller's started me this on amazing journey from a mechanical aspect. I, along with others here carry that ball forward.
My life will never be the same whether this here is the final step or 1 step in an incredible adventure towards infinity.

--giantkiller.

[Thaelin]

   Howard Johnson also passed on. Too bad they couldn't see thier dreams come to fruit.

thaelin

[singerxyz]

Just to confirm what ERFinder said about Tesla's ozone generator plates being actually a capacitor, while playing around with a Van De Graaf generator and a homemade capacitor/layden jar, I noticed that when I disconnected the negative pole (allowing charges to build up) I could smell ozone strongly, and could feel a cool breeze coming from the top of the center pole/wire in my cap.

love you guys!

[giantkiller]

If case there are those who haven't heard this before:

Twilight Zone 1963, 'To serve man'. The alien is addressing a United Nations like group.

How bizarre is this?

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=2535.0;attach=16287

--giantkiller. Posted twice