Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

[aleks]

One idea for everyone's attention. While it is known that DC bias voltage creates DC electro-magnetic field, I think this is not the right picture to see. The created DC field is in no way a constant field: this field probably consists of small "EM wavelets" that as a sum create DC EM field. DC EM field should not be confused with DC EM scalar wave, which is a true DC wave. If you understand me correctly you should see that by conventional means you need an antenna of size of a galaxy to create a DC EM wave.

[aleks]

but once I spent a lot of time with RF,
and realized that there is no relation to Longitudal waves, as far as touch goes, but they
affect each other.

Well, does it feel like a 'squeeze' (getting hotter) or 'expansion' (getting colder) when you sense those 'longitudal waves'?

[aleks]

That is an interesting way of seeing EM wave creation.

Here is where I get very confused.  A solid magnet.  I consider a solid magnet, or bar magnet,
or any mass with associated magnetic field, to be the same force as the "EM" magnetic field.

I think permanent magnets create their fields because of "internal" perpetual motion happening inside their structure (but I strongly believe it may be powered by Earth itself - who knows?). It is like "spin" which is also a perpetual motion - not that you can get energy out of it, it should be considered a "state" of matter. So, if we assume that EM field is created because of free electron "collisions", we may quickly describe effect of superconductivity and its relation to overly low temperatures and absense of magnetic field. When matter temperature is low, too little collisions occur; while higher temperature causes free electrons to collide because they have to interact with matter and this collision probability rises with temperature.

If there is little collision, there is little amount of EM waves created and most of them are reflected without penetration: hence, NO magnetic field is created or interacted with. (I hope I've got it right). As for the "collisions" of electrons, they are probably elastic collisions: much like that of rubber balls. Two electrons can be pressed toward each other and this will give a rise to a summary potential energy. Of course, we should not dismiss the fact that ether should exist. In this case such elastic interaction between two electrons (given they have a spin) may create a swirling formation which I would call an "EM wavelet". This means that a part of free electron collision energy is "wasted" to create this EM wavelet.

This EM wavelet is affected by surrounding potential fields and so it returns back thus creating a constant EM field. It is like a boomerang. That's why energy is not lost and permanent magnet can be called as having "internal" perpetual motion going on. In this respect a permanent magnet "redirects" magnetic field energy of Earth: it creates a kind of "lowest tension path" for Earth's magnetic lines and thus works as an magnetic flux amplifier. Right now I cannot find other descriptions of why permanent magnets 'work': if you have any data about measurements of permanent magnet force in deep-space please let me know.

[Hoppy]

Hi Loner

You are not alone in your thoughts - excuse the pun.

Ever since seeing the SM videos I have felt that if the whole thing is real, then the small TPU shows me that the device is probably simple in construction but maybe ingenious in control of the power generating process.

My own theory on the SM TPU is that It could be simple in build and operation if SM had found a way to circulate a huge discharge of energy from a battery within the device. I feel that there must have been a power source to start with, not necessarily physically large but having the potential to deliver a high current for a short duration of time. Having released this energy, I think the coils and any associated circuitry is used to maintain the flow of current to somehow act as a supercondutor. I doubt if many experimenters have for safety reasons ever tried to harness and control the power delivered from say a 'D' cell size NICAD battery or two into a virtual short circuit, or applied to an LC oscillator that could transform it's potentially huge current into a very high voltage for further processing. Call me nuts, but I think its more likely that SM took a simplistic approach to the building of his TPUbut maybe a complex and ingeniuos method of controlling the power dissipated by the power cells that could easily have been embedded within the fabric of his TPU.

As an aside, I have repaired some switch mode PSU's and on one repair I noticed a 10K resistor that had one lead wire completely parted with a blob of copper alloy at each end of the parted wire. However, when I measured the resistance I found it to be a full 10K! It showed no apparent sign of burning on the body of the resistor. It was as if the resistor had internally combusted as we see in those weird photos of bodies that appear to have been burnt from the inside out. Having seen this, I'm open to any suggestion about how the TPU may operate. There are some very clever minds working on this conundrum called a TPU but we still seem to be no nearer in solving the mystery.

Clive

[infringer]

Slowing things down.... With iron wire if your theory is correct because of the different cores we know electricity does conduct better in different materials and in different conditions. This to me reminds me over superconductivity talking about slowing current....

To tackle the heat issues there is always a means of cooling ....

Iron aluminum alloy, fans, refrigerants...

NASA has discovered a way to make processors that can operate fine at 6000 degrees something else to keep in mind.... Eliminate the heat issue which plagues every industry really operational today operating at extreme temperatures. Nothing new here.

I think what needs to be factored in here with materials is what causes super conductivity in the material + temp or -temp or possibly both and try to stray from moving in that direction(s)... If it is resistance we seek temperature is know to cause more or less resistance...

On the basis of these facts I myself wonder if this couldn't be an issue with achieving an easy working model I would assume the temperature in the environment would have an effect on the coils as well as moisture...

Now i will venture off topic because I cannot help but do so and this gives me an idea dint know why it did but I figured I would document my idea before I forget as I often tend to do.... And believe me I have had many good ideas but some stooped short by forgetting one problem with the system only yesterday have I came up with a good idea that is feasible for a cheap DIY wind turbine which I will not share until I can confirm it works which will be a long road.

I will give this idea:

Instead of using plates in electrolysis why not use hair thin copper wire in a vortex coil shape wrapped around a thicker gauge iron core or vice versa...

Also test a tightly wrapped vortex with a supporting structure of different dissimilar metals (hair thin) wrapped closely together but not touching what I am looking for is the plucking of the string effect to make a difference not only that but if done correctly bubbles formed would easily make there way to the top the tornado shape may be more officiant if turned upside down even it is very hard to say without testing...

If someone could test this along with variations along these lines please do as I have not seen people use super thin stretched tight wire in there setups... Also make the setup with features that would allow easy replacement... Drop in a new vortex and go... This is wild and I have nothing concrete to backup anything it is just something I haven't seen tested that may work. Please test and post results if you are an avid experimenter with the equipment to do so..

It is interesting cause if the lines  of dissimilar metals run next to each other like a guitar pickup in a vortexshape the fields running next to and above and below may cause more reaction ...

Hell maybe a TPU underwater would cause proper harmonics to break up water and the water would cool the iron core solving the heat issues!!!!

See where I'm going with this ?

Anyhow good work guys keep it up free power ain't impossible it is just an unknown that is seen everyday in nature perpetual motion is not possible because everything in the universe has a time period for which it will break down to dispurse itself as energy. But things can move perpetually for a lifetime of a human and that is more then enough to generate free power! The creation and destruction of matter could be thought of a perpetual event always on going slowly.

Books are great entertainment as they entertain thought. Laws are made to be broken.

-infringer-