Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

[poynt99]

double post

[Peterae]

Poynt
Thats all we need another Troll on this board LOL

Peter

[aleks]

what are you trying to do?

I'm trying to collect data and observations that may prove existence of DC force formations (DC acoustic waves, or scalar waves, or radiant energy or whatever). I have a hypothesis, I have speculated that Dirac function http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_delta_function (or Kronecker delta http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kronecker_delta) can be used to define non-equilibrium conditions where via multi-dimensional Fourier math the existence of DC wave component can be revealed.

Gravity in this respect can be also defined as DC force formation which is, however, is not some magical feature of "mass", but is a result of explosive or implosive sub-atomic and possibly inter-atomic and inter-molecular interactions. Electron having a constant charge field also suits well here, and its charge field can be defined as an "anti-gravity" DC force formation which is produced by its internal sub-electron interactions.

It's a pretty cool generalization, and if it stands to be correct, we can have a whole new world of unlimited energy-matter transformations.

[poynt99]

what are you trying to do?

I'm trying to collect data and observations that may prove existence of DC force formations (DC acoustic waves, or scalar waves, or radiant energy or whatever). I have a hypothesis, I have speculated that Dirac function http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_delta_function (or Kronecker delta http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kronecker_delta) can be used to define non-equilibrium conditions where via multi-dimensional Fourier math the existence of DC wave component can be revealed.

Gravity in this respect can be also defined as DC force formation which is, however, is not some magical feature of "mass", but is a result of explosive or implosive sub-atomic and possibly inter-atomic and inter-molecular interactions. Electron having a constant charge field also suits well here, and its charge field can be defined as an "anti-gravity" DC force formation which is produced by its internal sub-electron interactions.

It's a pretty cool generalization, and if it stands to be correct, we can have a whole new world of unlimited energy-matter transformations.

what does a saw-tooth (which you seem to like a lot) have to do with a dirac-delta function?

should have said instead of "you", but "you guys". re. squares, sines, saw-tooth etc. what are you trying to do with these wave forms?

[aleks]

what does a saw-tooth (which you seem to like a lot) have to do with a dirac-delta function?

Well, the front of saw-tooth wave is a Dirac delta function. Square wave has TWO such fronts, but they are + and - Dirac delta functions, so they negate each other. Hypothetically one creates "anti-gravity" and the other creates "gravity". The net effect is zero. Saw-tooth is different in this respect in that it creates "anti-gravity" only, and then slowly fades away without creating additional non-equilibrium.

For example, if you connect saw-tooth signal to some mechanical two-sided "hammer" that strikes two surfaces with its sides, it will violently strike surface 1 and then slowly strike surface 2. As a result, surface 1 will be more deformed in comparison to surface 2.

Well, the same happens in atomic lattice and electron flow. When sawtooth's front forces electrons to flow, they strike atomic lattice and each other violently causing heat dissipation and (hypothetically) DC force formation.

You may try to argue that it's better to strike up and down, but I think it's not the case. When you are striking down (in the case of a square wave) you already have an electron flow running. So, when you are dropping current from 12V to 0, the effect is reverse: atomic lattice goes back into the state of equilibrium. This also creates a DC force formation, but regarding overunity power it will sieze the surplus effect of the previous wave front.

These 'non-equilibirum' DC formation effects are universal in my opinion. The only question is how strong they are and how frequently they are created. Another question is how the energy flow is organized: if you do not use the possible surplus energy, it will dissipate or go back where it was "sitting". In the essence this means you need this device to work in a potential field in order to direct released energy. I think some low-power DC bias coil may do a good job at this. Without such potential field I do not see how released energy (if any) can be directed to do work.

Another possibility is that you do not need to close the load circuitry: have your collector coil with one end disconnected. If surplus energy potential is there, in the collector coil, it will go along wires as a least tension way. Well, Tesla had his "one-wire" power transfer line.