Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

[aleks]

Below I have posted a diagram of a gravity vs. inertia pump.

Why do you think it will work? If the train isn't accelerating, the water won't go to the high position. If you disagree, please prove that a underwater buoy in a moving reservoir will be moving in an opposite direction to the movement of reservoir. The reality is that buoy won't move relative to the reservoir's water.

[giantkiller]

Look deeper past the mechanical examples to see the analogies that are so apparent through these threads and you will see the hidden intensities insideTesla's patents.

Voltage changing to current at this point.

--giantkiller.

[aleks]

Voltage changing to current at this point.

So, what? Voltage changing to current is the same as one fast ball striking a stack of balls resulting in many slow balls. Well, I was incorrect in some previous post that voltage and current are the same thing. This is incorrect if you can fire off single electrons only. But here is the problem: how you can fire off a single electron only?

Anyway, I think this whole TPU thing is about creating a potential field. It is the only magical thing. However, it contradicts the normal physics in that you cannot create potential without investing kinetic energy. But when you use this potential, it fades away as soon as potential is used to create kinetic energy. It's a conservation of energy. So, the only possible answer is that TPU somehow manages to support potential field that DOES NOT fade away with kinetic energy it supplies to surrounding matter and particles. The only potential field I know that does the same is a gravity field or permanent magnet's magnetic field. Since it wasn't proved or disproved that electrons are affected by gravity, we are safe to assume that TPU creates gravity-related potential field (photons are also affected by gravity considering existing physics dogmas). Of course, TPU may create a permanent-magnet like field as well. But sharp gradients of square-waves or MOSFET avalanche discharge makes me think it is more about gravity and phonon interaction. Note that phonon interaction is much closer to inertia phenomenon and possible ether vortices than magnetic fields are. Magnetic field won't be created if you will be rotating a piece of wood, but ether vortex will be created. Another problem magnetic field possesses is that it is always a dipole and so basically it is transparent to electricity if magnetic field is not changing relative to electrical particles: it is as much attracts as repels. No to mention that magnetism can be exchanged with electricity in different relative inertial systems. So, gravity (ether potential) should be the effect that creates overunity.

It's a violation of conservation, but let's not be stopped by human deductions. Nature may have had a different idea about physics.

[sparks]

@alecks

      The water falling between the troughs isn't on the train anymore.  It is in the inertial frame of the air or slowing down relative to the train travel.  When the water contacts the lower trough it's inertia is relative to the trains inertia and travels up the sluiceway.  The flow needs to be pulsed though or the viscosity of the water will not allow seperation of the waterfall from the inertia of the train. 

[aleks]

The water falling between the troughs isn't on the train anymore.  It is in the inertial frame of the air or slowing down relative to the train travel.  When the water contacts the lower trough it's inertia is relative to the trains inertia and travels up the sluiceway.  The flow needs to be pulsed though or the viscosity of the water will not allow seperation of the waterfall from the inertia of the train. 

Well, you've corrected yourself (with pulsing which is additional energy input). When water is falling, it is still on the train - due to air being non-dense the change of train speed won't reach the water, of course, but the water has the same inertia vector as train when it falls down. It's a principle of relativity which holds even if we use term 'ether potential' instead of 'inertia'. Perpetual motion and inertia-less motion lies in the field of creating ether potentials at will. Nature does not show any examples of such free ether potential changes, unfortunately. Only saints levitated. (ether potential is gravity or DC acoustic wave in my book, but as I've described, existence of physical ether is not required to create DC acoustic waves - it sounds fantastic, but I can't do anything about it, DC acoustic waves are virtual; well, they are physical - but not in the sense you would expect - there is no physical counter-action on DC frequency - unless the body which was attracted by DC acoustic gradient strikes the source of gradient after gaining velocity)