SMOT! - (previously about the OC MPMM)

[RunningBare]

Go away @RunningBare. Your input isn't necessary. You have made no contributions to this field and your only role is to be a nuisance.

"yawns"


As small as my contributions have been, at least they have been real and not some fantasy.

I'm supporting these guys all the way, they have done great collaboration together with REAL science.
If your truly serious in supporting these guys Omni, please stop your continued rhetoric and look at the REAL aspects of this.

It may slow and stop eventually, but the remarkable thing is that it accelerates first, at the very least I'm convinced they've discovered something new, OU or NOT.

[Omnibus]

You have no contributions. And you're not supporting these guys. You're a hypocrite. I have rarely seen anyone spew so much crap throughout all these years in a forum and have no shame.

[Mr.Entropy]

I've been posting here for 3 months about this machine and nobody ever took the time to really look at it. Now, there's a video and everyone goes nuts.

I looked at it.  I thought it was pretty clever -- it took me longer than it should have to figure out that it doesn't work according to conventional physics.  I'm not here to rain on people, so I just shut up about it.

Now Al has this video of something different -- not your original design but something related that was discovered in the process of trying to replicate your design.  It also doesn't work according to conventional physics, and it won't work in any accurate simulation of conventional physics.

The experiment is the key, because it does seem to work in real life.  If that bears out, it means that you and Al have discovered some new physics, and the possibility of that is a good reason to stand up and take notice... good enough that I've ordered magnets.

The video shows an obvious overunity event -- more energy comes out than Al put in.  If it bears out, you and Al will be famous.  Congrats!

Cheers,

Mr. Entropy

[Omnibus]

@Mr. Entropy,

The question of priority was discussed extensively in the Steorn forum and I also told @overconfident (@rotorhead here), as you do, that in fact @alsetalonkin has done something different from @overconfident?s original design. Besides, as you seem also to agree, I told @overconfident that the priority goes to the person who first demonstrates a working motor in flesh and blood violating CoE. These ideas and the numerous variations thereof are known for a long time, for centuries, if you wish, and that?s not what will convince anybody. Only the experiment is what matters in this case. @overconfident saw this by himself?prior to the video no one was paying attention to his idea. I know @overconfident isn?t happy with this fact but that?s the way science functions.

There is one thing which, however, the likes of you should never forget and that is that the discovery that CoE can be violated and energy out of nothing can be produced has already been made experimentally and rigorously proven theoretucally prior to @alsetalonkin?s experiment. My analysis and rigorous proof that CoE can be violated has already been around in numerous posting and in various forums already for almost two years. And what is most interesting, the rigorous scientific proof I?ve put forth is not any ?new physics? as you expect but comes about from well-known equations of the classical physics and hitherto overlooked possibilities in classical physics for the discovered violation of the principle of conservation of energy (CoE). Never forget that.

[Low-Q]

Interesting video. I would however liked to see the machine from underneath as well, and not only from the upper side. So there is only 8 rotor magnets pointing its poles N-S, S-N etc. and three freely rotating stator magnets. The rotor is spinning clockwise, and the stator magnets are of course spinning counter clockwise when the rotor was turned clockwise. What is the purpose of accelerating the farmost magnet counter clockwise? Why did the two other stator magnets retain still after it was stopped during the operation? And why did the rotor accelerate when these two magnets was stopped? Less drag? What happens when the machine is kept vertical - will it then stop?
I'm sitting here as a big question mark , and I'm for sure hoping that this machine has potential, and at the same time hoping that there isn't any spooky underneath the machine - something like wires and batteries....

br.

Vidar