SMOT! - (previously about the OC MPMM)

[Omnibus]

Continuously posting crap won't help you figure out what's what. Think more and try to learn some things first.

[Low-Q]

Continuously posting crap won't help you figure out what's what. Think more and try to learn some things first.

Sure I can write down an equation to proove my claim, but you wouldn't be interested in that i guess.

All mass have a certain extent, where each an every bit of that volume is influed differently and independently on other objects and forces. However the ball is solid, and everything you do on the surface will influence on the whole ball, but that wouldn't change the issue. You cannot simply ignore an objects extent in an equation for issues like the SMOT - just to take an example. Your equation will probaly be correct for an infinite small object but with same weight and magnetic properties as the ball, and without the extent surface that will change this objects path.

At least you should look at this, before you write derogatory assertions about anyone.

Vidar.

[Omnibus]

@Low-Q,

What you're writing is nonsense. When somethings is nonsense it must be identified as such and that isn't derogatory.

[tinu]

What remains true is that CoE is violated. As for your confusion, you have to deal with it not anybody else.

Yes, the truth is that CoE, according to the math, is violated. ...

Vidar

@ Vidar,

What math?! Point it to me if you?re aware of it.
Imho such math was never posted; nevertheless, it doesn?t matter because it does not exist: CoE is obeyed.

Tinu

[modervador]

If the ball is moving from B to C, the ball vill be able to go back to A from C, on one condition: If mgh2 is less than the diameter of the ball.

I don't think this is true. The conditions for the ball to go from B to C to A without help are Mb > mgh2 and Mb + mgh1 >= Ma. I don't see any restriction on ball diameter relative to h2.

I presume you meant to compare the diameter with h2 (distance) not with mgh2 (energy).