Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

Started by hartiberlin, October 11, 2007, 05:28:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

DrStiffler

Output improving with new coil setup.

Bulb is not full brightness, but it is constant, no sidac, no capacitor needed.

All things are possible but some are impractical.

EMdevices


Loki67671

Dr. Stiffler,
I did not intend any implication that your work was/is Aspdens work. I see the differences and similarities. No offence intended or taken.....hopefully.

Some questions if I may:

1. Have you posted construction details of your Colpitts Oscillator? Specifically design requirements like Q and the details of the tunable inductance in the base ckt? I notice that you use this circuit in most of the videos when not driving/exciting with an RF genny. Is a collector circuit 22uH choke wound on toroid core suitable? In other words do I need to design a Colpitts Oscillator and if so I would obviously like it to cover the characteristics or be as close to the design you are using? Please just point me in the correct direction and I will study or design as appropriate.

2. The cotton braided litz from the antenna is also fairly consistent in your designs. The cores are not. Excitation of the secondary may change but the geometric orientation seems not to. The Secondary winding of litz wire inside the exciter seems to be common. Skin effect and capacitance?? Reduction or elimination of the primary excitation components induction by moving to the Screen? Is that a copper pipe in the last posting? In your mind/experience is this arrangement and relationship between the excitation element and the excited element necessary. I know, I know, build the damned circuit and find out. I am while I also search through 50 boxes of accumulated components for usable goodies.

Now I'm going to be roaming about with a friggin neon bulb "seeing" what I was not "seeing" before in radios and the embedded systems I work with. It will be fascinating to roam about a locomotive electrical cabinet, carefully I might add, with a neon  ;) 

Keep up the good work....at least our creative minds are stimulated.........This is like spinning the bicycle wheel, (AV plug), hit it in the right direction and zoom, hit it in the wrong direction and  :(. Very interesting.
"When the water stinks, I break the dam, with Love I break it" .............Loki

"One must be completely immersed in the cold darkness to truly adore or loathe the light" .............Loki

Science, my lad, is made up of mistakes, but they are mistakes which it is useful to make, because they lead little by little to the truth." - Jules Verne

Hoppy

Quote from: RStiffler on January 27, 2008, 10:52:11 PM
Output improving with new coil setup.

Bulb is not full brightness, but it is constant, no sidac, no capacitor needed.



Dr. Stiffler

What is the DC current draw of the oscillator whilst lighting the bulb please?

Hoppy

DrStiffler

Quote from: Loki67671 on January 28, 2008, 05:45:41 AM
Dr. Stiffler,
I did not intend any implication that your work was/is Aspdens work. I see the differences and similarities. No offence intended or taken.....hopefully.

Some questions if I may:

1. Have you posted construction details of your Colpitts Oscillator? Specifically design requirements like Q and the details of the tunable inductance in the base ckt? I notice that you use this circuit in most of the videos when not driving/exciting with an RF genny. Is a collector circuit 22uH choke wound on toroid core suitable? In other words do I need to design a Colpitts Oscillator and if so I would obviously like it to cover the characteristics or be as close to the design you are using? Please just point me in the correct direction and I will study or design as appropriate.

2. The cotton braided litz from the antenna is also fairly consistent in your designs. The cores are not. Excitation of the secondary may change but the geometric orientation seems not to. The Secondary winding of litz wire inside the exciter seems to be common. Skin effect and capacitance?? Reduction or elimination of the primary excitation components induction by moving to the Screen? Is that a copper pipe in the last posting? In your mind/experience is this arrangement and relationship between the excitation element and the excited element necessary. I know, I know, build the damned circuit and find out. I am while I also search through 50 boxes of accumulated components for usable goodies.

Now I'm going to be roaming about with a friggin neon bulb "seeing" what I was not "seeing" before in radios and the embedded systems I work with. It will be fascinating to roam about a locomotive electrical cabinet, carefully I might add, with a neon  ;) 

Keep up the good work....at least our creative minds are stimulated.........This is like spinning the bicycle wheel, (AV plug), hit it in the right direction and zoom, hit it in the wrong direction and  :(. Very interesting.

I did not in any way see anything you said as offensive towards me, and I do want to know, because I asked and am not sure in my mind that what I am doing is not in fact and implementation of Dr. Aspdens idea. If so I'm sure he is happy someone has worked towards that goal and if so, I do want to insure he would receive credit for the work. That said, I really feel that many minds come up with similar ideas at one time or another. As Dr. Aspden express himself that maybe his idea is a mere extension on Cooks work, way before Tesla. If my work is really theirs they have credit, I want credit for doing it today.

Now there are many post and questions and what I feel need to be done here is a hiatus, my work is about to be submitted to independent testing labs for verification.

So lets all sit back for a week or so and cross our fingers (me my toes included) and see what happens. If I receive favorable results, we all are headed for a home run. If it is bad news than I have saved everyone a lot of fussing around with high hopes.

Is this proper to propose?
All things are possible but some are impractical.