Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[Cap-Z-ro]

I have been following these developments as much as my limited understanding of circuitry will allow.

If everyone were to chime in whenever there is friction between two posters, this would be too much for most to want to sift through...thereby accomplishing exactly what those who poke sticks in the wheels of progress set out to do when the light starts shining through.

So, please refrain from adding to the background noise with non productive venting.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation.

Regards...

[ramset]

WILBY nicely put
BEN nice observation Oxy off to the side
Chet

[aether22]

What I do is come up with correlations, and while it's just a curiosity at this moment I may have found one.

Stiffler told me something and said 'private' so I checked with him first and it appears that he's given me the Ok but the reply was defiantly short and non expressive so I hope I'm not going beyond what he meant or wished, anyhow when my SEC attempt failed Stiffler informed me that "base circuit causes bifurcation", he said some other stuff but let's just stick to that. (I will note that he did mention not all transistors work, though I think he has likely mentioned that before?)

Ben mentioned something weird in the Bifurcated electrolysis circuit.

Then there is the optical coherence circuit Stiffler made which again used Bifurcation.
And of course the AV plug.

And JLN's AFEP, Tesla coils, Autoignotion coils and various others, parallel bucking bifilar and caduceus coils?
I 'untangled' Hendershots circuit recently and it seems to fit very well.
Ed Gray's 'Splitting the positive'?

So is there something that happens in such circuits?

Could it be separation of 2 different current types?
Or slamming of different currents into each other which excites the aether/lattice? (of course that does not fit the term)
Or currents flowing 2 directions in the same wire?
Does current loop around in the 2 branches (as in an AV plug)?
Is there induction between the branches? (I'd guess not in all cases)

There could be multiple effects and plenty of reasons both conventional and unconventional for such a circuit topology, and if you don't give it the right conditions it won't work, assuming the correlation is valid which it could easily not be given the lack of data.

This is due to it's simplicity and commonality not going to be a very easy correlation to prove by growing it by further data mining.

But if you are like me you look for 'keys' for 'secrets' that engage the unconventional component in all of this technology then this might be something to try out, a design feature to add.

Of course Stiffler could give his opinion about this as it is almost exclusively his circuits I'm correlating , is this Bifurcation a key tool for tapping/disrupting the lattice? (If he doesn't know what I'm talking about you can pretty much rule this correlation out, but so far it seems to be a favorite circuit design and observation of his)

[k4zep]

WILBY nicely put
BEN nice observation Oxy off to the side
Chet

Hi Gang,

To all the thinking heads out there...............OK..............THINK.............

How many equivalent watts of heat + light is in that nice hydrogen flame as DEMONSTRATED BY DR. STIFFLER?

What is the worse case electrical input in watts to the SEC?

OK THINK just a little bit..................How much more does he have to feed it to you.  95% of the good folk on this list should have figured it out by now and be grinning like heck.  The other 5 % will come up with a theory about why it isn't heat, why it isn't light, why it can't be that efficient.  Come on pontificates (BS Artists), give us a break.......

How efficient is it?  The answer is somewhere between 0 and XXXX watts, have some fun here, do some research!......

Any answer longer than three lines is someone who just likes to jaw about things.

You don't have to "Publish or Perish" on this list just straight answers will do?

Respectfully

Ben

[aether22]

It's obviously OU, but what should we have figured out?
Based on the figures he provided it takes multiple pairs to become OU though and a really useful input may require a larger SEC.
Not seen (well technically not heard) the video yet.

Maybe you believe OU to be less common with electrolysis than I do? Still yes it is very good, but maybe I'm missing something? (is it crazy OU?)

BTW what did you think you had found the other day?