Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[Bob Smith]

Can I ask, is mr. Stiffler really a "doctor"? Is electrotrechnics his hobby, or profession?
Why he doesn't try to charm and convince his "academic colleagues"? Why he is seeking for approval in the "fringe science" sites?? Why, oh, why... Is he just a charlatan?
You tell me..

@Spinner. Anyone who's been around the FE scene long enough knows that there is hell to pay when one steps outside the politically correct, socially engineered groupspeak, mindthink and paradigms that serve those whose interests benefit from limiting access to free, abundant energy.  Character assassination, vilification and ostracization from the scientific establishment are usually part of this "hell to pay." 

The doc has played his cards well, I believe.  He has judiciously shared the fruits of his careful professional investigations.

B

[MarkSnoswell]

Looking forward to see his 2 cap unit running !

I have completed a series of rigorous capacitor -to- capacitor tests of this style of circuit and a number of significantly improved versions. These tests were done using electrolytic capacitors and not electrochemical capacitors. The capacitors I used were well characterized under the experimental conditions used and shown to be working as pure capacitances within a close tolerance. In all cases the energy yield is less than unity. This is despite the NLO oscillator and improved variations running in what Stiffler would call "Ultra Wide Band" mode.

Tests using electrochemical capacitors (such as those used by Stiffler in his recent documented ESEC work) are fraught with problems. This is particularly true if researchers are using the car audio grade capacitors (as Stiffler is) rather than electrochemical capacitors manufactured by makers such as Maxwell. Not only do these car audio capacitors have far lower capacitances than advertised (only 5 - 30% of advertised values in tests I have done) but their apparent capacitances vary greatly under varying operational conditions. Particularly notable is the reduction in their apparent capacitance under condition of rapid charge and discharging cycles such as Stiffler claimed the best performance for. Under such conditions calculations of the power yielded can be in error by very large margins if assumptions are made based on advertised and constant capacitance.

People using this sort of non linear, negative resistance transistor oscillator (http://www.urel.feec.vutbr.cz/RADIOENG/fulltexts/2005/05_04_033_039.pdf), would be well advised to study its performance before implementing it. Notably there is a significant frequency dependence on voltage and also a number of different modes of operation at wider voltage ranges. The steps seen in some graphs on Stifflers ESEC page are expected from this class of oscillator as the voltage varies the oscillator’s performance. -- over the voltage range applied the frequency shift is so great that the oscillator output sweeps more than one octave and in doing so drives the so called output inductor through several self resonance modes. Contrary to what Stiffler implies it is extremely easy to monitor the oscillator performance with an oscilloscope without altering its performance. Furthermore I have found the experimental version of the circuit to closely follow the performance of SPICE Simulations of the circuit which provides for a further validation of experimental circuit behaviour.

[spinner]

@Spinner. Anyone who's been around the FE scene long enough knows that there is hell to pay when one steps outside the politically correct, socially engineered groupspeak, mindthink and paradigms that serve those whose interests benefit from limiting access to free, abundant energy.  Character assassination, vilification and ostracization from the scientific establishment are usually part of this "hell to pay." 

The doc has played his cards well, I believe.  He has judiciously shared the fruits of his careful professional investigations.

B

The classics.... Suppression...    Paradigm shift..., a physics revolution..., Big Oil revenge..., etc, etc.... "Single wire... Overunity.... Blablablah...." Yadadadada.....

We'll see... ("soon...")

Mr. Stffler never answered any of my few (valid) questions..... I made just a few posts in his thread....
The best he can came up with was deleting the "annoying",  skeptical...,  "unwanted" posts. ..

For me, case closed...
Ah, never mind....

Btw, Mr. Bob Smith, I'm on this scene long enough to know what I'm talking about...
O K ? 

[canam101]

Just wanted to check in after not reading this thread for several months. Too many posts have accumulated to go through them, but It's been a year or more since we first heard that it was apparently OU: has Dr. Stiffler finally tweaked his device enough so that it is self-powered?

I hope the answer is yes, because I could use a break from the fuel bills.

[DrStiffler]

I have completed a series of rigorous capacitor -to- capacitor tests of this style of circuit and a number of significantly improved versions. These tests were done using electrolytic capacitors and not electrochemical capacitors. The capacitors I used were well characterized under the experimental conditions used and shown to be working as pure capacitances within a close tolerance. In all cases the energy yield is less than unity. This is despite the NLO oscillator and improved variations running in what Stiffler would call "Ultra Wide Band" mode.

Tests using electrochemical capacitors (such as those used by Stiffler in his recent documented ESEC work) are fraught with problems. This is particularly true if researchers are using the car audio grade capacitors (as Stiffler is) rather than electrochemical capacitors manufactured by makers such as Maxwell. Not only do these car audio capacitors have far lower capacitances than advertised (only 5 - 30% of advertised values in tests I have done) but their apparent capacitances vary greatly under varying operational conditions. Particularly notable is the reduction in their apparent capacitance under condition of rapid charge and discharging cycles such as Stiffler claimed the best performance for. Under such conditions calculations of the power yielded can be in error by very large margins if assumptions are made based on advertised and constant capacitance.

People using this sort of non linear, negative resistance transistor oscillator (http://www.urel.feec.vutbr.cz/RADIOENG/fulltexts/2005/05_04_033_039.pdf), would be well advised to study its performance before implementing it. Notably there is a significant frequency dependence on voltage and also a number of different modes of operation at wider voltage ranges. The steps seen in some graphs on Stifflers ESEC page are expected from this class of oscillator as the voltage varies the oscillator’s performance. -- over the voltage range applied the frequency shift is so great that the oscillator output sweeps more than one octave and in doing so drives the so called output inductor through several self resonance modes. Contrary to what Stiffler implies it is extremely easy to monitor the oscillator performance with an oscilloscope without altering its performance. Furthermore I have found the experimental version of the circuit to closely follow the performance of SPICE Simulations of the circuit which provides for a further validation of experimental circuit behaviour.

Gee Mark I know Lattice333 is so happy his brother? is getting into the act, but as always there are those that think they are the people with the "RIGHT ANSWER". Gee Mark you think I am dumb enought to not know what I'm working with, maybe you best think again.