Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[hansvonlieven]

G'day all,

Periodic table, resonant frequencies:

http://www.eclipse.net/~numare/nsinmrpt.htm

Hans von Lieven

[Freenrg4me]

*Removed* by RStiffler

[hartiberlin]

The schematic is here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3457.msg54343.html#msg54343

Read the whole thread without hectic...

[Freenrg4me]

@ mramos

I assume by the note at the end you saw that relative to 1H part?

I don't know if this has anything to do with OU or Meyer or anything at all but I thought that is was interesting and perhaps someone can beat me to answering the question.

Is the water itself triggering the state change of a transistor?
I.e., was the movable probe in the Meyer notes a transistor on a stick with the gate exposed to the water?
Was the chamber itself surrounded by a barium ferrite core?

In the photos of the final Meyer water car, there is a large space between between the water cavity and the outside device. I have been puzzled by what occupied that space.

[hartiberlin]

Dr. Stiffler updated his page again.

Here are the new parts:

Circuit Comments

B1,B2,B2 & B4 with C1 form a delay line.

Removal of C1 will stop circuit operation and extinguish the LED.
Replacing C1 with a wire will reduce the LED output to barely visible or extinguished.
Removal of B1,B2,B2 & B4 and C1 and replacing with a short wire will extinguish the LED.

Pay special attention to the supplied scope pictures of this circuit in operation and not that the Peak-to-Peak voltage present at the junction (+rail) of B2 and L2 is ~8 (Scope{4}) volts. This voltage should always be higher than the input when the circuit is properly tuned into operational mode.

Tuning for maximum power at the LED is subjective if you use human visual reference for the amount of LED light output. This can get you close, but is not the most accurate way to find the three peaks available. I use a Lutron light meter and a black isolation tube around the LED. The circuit can be tuned for maximum light output, although this can also be in error due to the way LED's react to excitation at different frequencies, yet this can be an acceptable preliminary observation.

The most accurate I have found so far is using a small form factor (small size and mass) DVM (accuracy not important) with leads as short as possible connected across a 10k ohm resistor, bridged with a 5uf capacitor at the output of the rectifiers. With this configuration one can tune input for maximum voltage indication. The down side to this method is that the added L and C of the meter and connections do indeed shift the optimal peaks.

During tuning using both of the methods indicated above, the peaks (excluding LED frequency response) fall with in ~+/- 200khz of each other.

The peak frequencies have been derived by scope and counter measurement, with the most accurate being the frequency counter. This circuit appears to 'Hunt' and therefore even the counter cannot be considered totally accurate, as the readings will vary over many kilohertz as the circuit 'Hunts' for stability.

The following chart shows the frequency versus relative power from a test run on Circuit (4), using the DVM method of measurement and reading the frequency with a counter with 0.001% accuracy.

The following table shows the measured frequency peaks and their first three harmonics.

Measured (MHz)        3.9866     10.4230        12.3340
X2                        7.9732      20.8460     24.6680
X3                        11.9598    31.2690    37.0020
X4                        15.9464    41.6920    49.3360


It is noted at this point that in the scope traces (for #4) included below show scope-measured frequencies of 6.99MHz, 7.14MHz and 10MHz. The trace was not expanded as it should have been to obtain a more accurate reading, yet there can be seen a correlation with the counter readings.