Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[k4zep]

Isn't closing the loop going to break the dia-pole and rid us of the radiant energy being created? When that happens we end up in the realm of the underunity where all of our conventional devices work in...but not really where we want to be.

Is it possible to generate energy @ a overunit rate, then transfer that energy to a closed loop system, that is take energy from open ended system, transfer it to closed loop system while not disturbing the OU system.

[amigo]

Is it possible to generate energy @ a overunit rate, then transfer that energy to a closed loop system, that is take energy from open ended system, transfer it to closed loop system while not disturbing the OU system.

Hi

I will assume you wanted to say "It is..." rather than "Is it...", and I agree there is a way to transfer the energy, one of them by charging and discharging a capacitor the way Bedini does it, but I was hoping to allude to a lack of devices that use radiant energy directly from the source and are based on open loop system.

I think we should divide our focus not just on tapping into the sea of radiant energy but also constructing devices that are powered by it directly in accordance with natural principles. Else, if we continue converting to our closed loop system we just perpetuate the old inefficient ways.

[derricka]

Hi Harti
Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words.
So...I have attached a picture showing how a coil actually has some built in capacitance.
Best of luck with your replication efforts.
DerrickA

[hoptoad]

", but I was hoping to allude to a lack of devices that use radiant energy directly from the source and are based on open loop system. "

I think we should divide our focus not just on tapping into the sea of radiant energy but also constructing devices that are powered by it directly in accordance with natural principles. Else, if we continue converting to our closed loop system we just perpetuate the old inefficient ways.

Well observed Amigo.

I've been reading this thread diligently and excitedly as replications (of sorts) have added to the weight of Dr Stifflers work.

Between 1990 and 2002 I spent those years analysing the Adams Motor and other pulsed motor systems. Never once, in all that time, and after building 100's of the pulsed "little demons", did I, IMHO, ever achieve O/U.
But a couple of things about the Adams motor really bugged me. So much about their characteristics and the way they operated intrigued me to a point where I persisted with every possible experiment I could conceive of.

And I'm glad I did. I am still skeptical of the notion that you will get O/U from an Adams Motor. But I am damn sure about one thing in particular, and that is: AN OPEN MAGNETIC SYTEM is more effiicient than a Closed Magnetic System! And an Adams pulsed motor/generator, if nothing else, is a useful tool in proving it!

When I first started experimenting with pulsed motor systems, I was completely skeptical of the notion of O/U in any sense or meaning of the words.

My years of experimenting with pulsed motor/generator systems has left me sitting in the "middle of the fence" these days. I still lean towards skepticism in O/U forums, especially when words like "something from nothing" appear in a sentence, as opposed to "something for nothing".

Bu these days I consider myself to be an "active skeptic". Meaning, that I try to keep an open mind to all possibilities, and actively seek to understand new phenomena or explanations by way of literature research and hand's on experimentation where my skills allow. To me replication is the key to verification. Understanding will follow!

The possibilty of "tapping" a heretofore unknown or misunderstood source of energy is one that needs the greatest of attention in the here and now.

I applaud the work of all those who come to this forum, seeking to exchange their ideas and freely expressing their thoughts.

Sorry to go a little off topic here, but Amigos, you're right on the knocker with your statement. "Else, if we continue converting to our closed loop system we just perpetuate the old inefficient ways."


If any of you are interested, I set up a few pages a couple of weeks back to help some "Adams motor" beginners deal with some of the issues
they had with component failure inthere motor circuits. I never intended it to, but the few pages grew to a total of ten. Once I started recapping
on some old knowledge to try to help these guys out a little bit, it just kinda started frothing out of my mouth, so to speak. Anyway, the long and the short of it is this, on page 10 I outline a very simple experiment that can be done by anybody with some rudimentary electronic/building skills which shows that you can easily "Bend Lenz's Law".

Those are bold words, I know! Notice I didn't say "break", just "bend". But Bend in a big way. After proving this myself (and to other peers), and knowing that anybody else can also prove it themselves, I am much more open to the idea that other "Laws" can probably be "bent". The key here is not to do what has always been done, and not to assume what is always assumed.

For anyone interested in "Bending Lenz's Law", heres a link. When you get there just click on page 10      http://www.totallyamped.net/adams


Cheers and KneeDeep from the Toad who Hops 

P.S. Keep up the great work everyone!

[Hoppy]

Picking up on hoptoad's post, I share his views in general having spent the last couple of years seriously studying Bedini technology. I have been following this thread from the beginning and decided recently to try this 'one wire working' with a Bedini SG energiser running at 25Khz. I found that I could easily illuminate a few 'blue' LED's using an AV plug with a short open wire tail to 'tune' the plug. The plug was connected directly to the energiser's output 'compression' diode'. A very small current of 100uA (measured with an AVO 8 meter in series with LED) will light the LED's to a good visible level with no additional chokes needed. Increasing the 'spike' level from the energiser, considerably increases the current available to the LED's. I coupled the AV plug through a 100pf polystyrene cap.

Hoppy