Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[amigo]

hoptoad, thanks for your post.

I agree that we do not need to break any physical laws, or even bend them for that matter. Any physical law is based on someone's observations and/or empirical proof, supported by others agreeing to accept it - a consensus. No where does it say anything is set in stone, and I really shiver when some people (in our orthodox scientific community and academia) talk about things as if they are set in stone, because it only shows how narrow minded they can be.

Personally, I am trying to look at different technologies and findings from various fields of alternative research in hope that they could be combined into something greater than any of the components creating it. What bothers me is that many people are obsessed with this O/U goal that they are forgetting that there's no "free beer" or everything for nothing. I think Tom Bearden nicely said in of the videos that we only need to invest a small amount of energy and the Nature will give us back everything we can take, and more, but as long as we follow Nature's principles (of open loop and not breaking the diapoles).

That is why I said that we need to focus on the two goals and not one: tapping into RE sea of energy through some easy and least costly (energetically) method; and other of creating the devices (to replace our existing ones) that will be driven by that generated energy without converting it to some other form (closed loop wasteful energy for example).

I strongly believe that we already have the answer, and it is within us and around us. Our own bodies are an open loop system, part of an even larger open loop system. We need to explore the principles present within us and create a "primer", that very first method of tapping into the RE which everything will stem from, because it's all really one and the same thing on some other higher level beyond our perception (or comprehension at the moment).

[Pirate88179]

Amigo:

Well put.  I have always looked to nature for engineering suggestions.  She is pretty good at it afterall.  When I consider the human body, that you can eat an apple and work all day off of the energy from that apple....pretty efficient system there.  And then consider that our waste fertilizes the apple tree afterwards.....perfect. Nature is our answer, we just have to look past the laws and our narrow minded thinking to see it.

Bill

[hartiberlin]

I justsaw,
that Dr.Stiffler has just published his new circuit diagram on his website
http://www.drstiffler.com/ce4.asp

Here it is:

I just got an email with a few comments to this circuit and
the core:

For one the connection from R3 to R2 is wrong and should not be there.
Next Q1 is a oscillator driving M1 as an amplifier.
This is a typical RF transmitter circuit.
The output from M1 is where you would put an antenna. In this case the antenna is a wire running to a coil. L1 and L3 are what is known as a antenna tuner or matching circuit. As most hams know when the antenna length or is tuned to the wright frequencies the alternating current or voltage will flow back and forth in tune with driver. That is why one wire works here.
Next L2 picks up the voltage from the antenna and amplifies it some due to the transformer action. This becomes like the receiving antenna.
Next D1 and D2 make a voltage doubler charging the capacitor Cp to twice the input voltage.
Next the 555 timer just turns the load on and off.
The D1 and D2 and capacitor make what is known as a charge pump. The size of the capacitor determines the amperage. The larger the capacitor is the longer it takes to build up full charge but the discharge is determined by the size of the capacitor and load.
Besides using one wire output and input this is exactly the same way a 1.5 volt battery in a flash camera makes the 3000 volts to flash the bulb.


Dr. Stiffler states that the iron core on the coils had Barium in it. I have been in electronics since I was 13 years old and have never heard of Barium being used in a ferrite bar. So I did some research for different core manufactures and none I found had Barimum. My cores are made with Iron particales with a zinc magnesium base. Some cores use copper, nickel and Aluminum as doping compounds. As Copper and Aluminum are para magnetic and will increase the frequency response on the core.
Next although this most likely was not from Stiffer but a neon bulb will give off light due to the ionization on the neon at high frequencies. Only a few volts at high frequencies will light the bulb. I used to test some car CB's buy touching on lead from a neon bulb to the antenna. The volage at the antenna was no where near 90 volts.
But at least post that the connection on Q1 R3 to R2 is wrong. Next C7 may be best suited to a variable capacitor to fine tune the antenna output.
Maybe my dual 266pf can be connected to operate 10- 532pf. For driving neon bulbs capacitor Cp may not be needed or a very low value. You can put a load resistor across Cp say 10k or so and adjust the variable capacitor for max voltage with the 555 timer not in operation.

[DrStiffler]

I justsaw,
that Dr.Stiffler has just published his new circuit diagram on his website
http://www.drstiffler.com/ce4.asp

Here it is:

I just got an email with a few comments to this circuit and
the core:

For one the connection from R3 to R2 is wrong and should not be there.
Next Q1 is a oscillator driving M1 as an amplifier.
This is a typical RF transmitter circuit.
The output from M1 is where you would put an antenna. In this case the antenna is a wire running to a coil. L1 and L3 are what is known as a antenna tuner or matching circuit. As most hams know when the antenna length or is tuned to the wright frequencies the alternating current or voltage will flow back and forth in tune with driver. That is why one wire works here.
Next L2 picks up the voltage from the antenna and amplifies it some due to the transformer action. This becomes like the receiving antenna.
Next D1 and D2 make a voltage doubler charging the capacitor Cp to twice the input voltage.
Next the 555 timer just turns the load on and off.
The D1 and D2 and capacitor make what is known as a charge pump. The size of the capacitor determines the amperage. The larger the capacitor is the longer it takes to build up full charge but the discharge is determined by the size of the capacitor and load.
Besides using one wire output and input this is exactly the same way a 1.5 volt battery in a flash camera makes the 3000 volts to flash the bulb.


Dr. Stiffler states that the iron core on the coils had Barium in it. I have been in electronics since I was 13 years old and have never heard of Barium being used in a ferrite bar. So I did some research for different core manufactures and none I found had Barimum. My cores are made with Iron particales with a zinc magnesium base. Some cores use copper, nickel and Aluminum as doping compounds. As Copper and Aluminum are para magnetic and will increase the frequency response on the core.
Next although this most likely was not from Stiffer but a neon bulb will give off light due to the ionization on the neon at high frequencies. Only a few volts at high frequencies will light the bulb. I used to test some car CB's buy touching on lead from a neon bulb to the antenna. The volage at the antenna was no where near 90 volts.
But at least post that the connection on Q1 R3 to R2 is wrong. Next C7 may be best suited to a variable capacitor to fine tune the antenna output.
Maybe my dual 266pf can be connected to operate 10- 532pf. For driving neon bulbs capacitor Cp may not be needed or a very low value. You can put a load resistor across Cp say 10k or so and adjust the variable capacitor for max voltage with the 555 timer not in operation.

This is a good indication on why we are limiting the distribution of our circuits. You must have pulled this one from your you computer because it has been corrected for over a week now. Good indication of why we are enforcing the Copyrights, of which you seem to have violated?

>>This is a typical RF transmitter circuit.
You are so wrong!

>>Besides using one wire output and input this is exactly the same way a 1.5 volt battery in a flash camera makes the 3000 volts to flash the bulb.
So far off I will not even comment.

>>Dr. Stiffler states that the iron core on the coils had Barium in it. I have been in electronics since I was 13 years old and have never heard of Barium being used in a ferrite bar. So I did some research for different core manufactures and none I found had Barimum. My cores are made with Iron particales with a zinc magnesium base. Some cores use copper, nickel and Aluminum as doping compounds. As Copper and Aluminum are para magnetic and will increase the frequency response on the core.

Still some funny people out there.!!!

I logged in today to announce something very important, but now seeing this it can wait a bit. I guess we need to stimulate traffic a bit by posting this kind of crap.

[canam101]

I logged in today to announce something very important, but now seeing this it can wait a bit.

This is getting hilarious - a sort of intellectual strip tease.  If you take so much umbrage at normal skepticism, you will run out of places to announce anything.

Instead of getting so ticked off when somebody dares to suggest that they don't believe 110 percent in whatever it is you think you have, ignore them and make the big announcement.

If you really have anything, it will shut up the skeptics quickly enough. But the more coy you continue to be, and the more the experimenters are unable to come up with OU, the more people will think you have nothing.