Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[DrZLowe7]

It is hard for me to keep jumping to Stifler's web site and back to see what he has done. Most of his coil windings do not show the red dot. The windings are very hard to discern on some coils what direction that is. All my coils seem to be the same. With the red dot up and to your left start winding the coil in a counter clock wise direction starting from your left. I hope this make sense all this left and right stuff. If you need maybe I can a picture tomorrow. Happy experimenting and good luck.
In case I am wrong about all 4000 parts being the same ,I can not check them all but I did a random check of several hundred. If you think this may be causing you problems when you protype your circuit just reverse the outer winding leads in your circuit.
Another thing he keeps showing L2 in the schematic posted some pages back as a dual winding. If the coil you are winding is L3 it makes no difference which direction it is wound.

[hoptoad]

How totally unpredictable .. hahaha

Oh the great Stifeler has decided to punish us and make us wait ... lol .. get out of here .. are you guys still buying this malarky !!

Cheers,

Keep on Keeping on ...

Dean

KneeDeep...Yeh, I'm sort of buying the malarky. Me, I don't believe in O/U. But each jump for the impossible, brings within reach the newly possible. We all know that LEDS are more efficient than Incandescent Lamps in terms of Lumens per watt, but is direct current versus RF excitation the best means to get those lumens per watt?

That is the....KneeDeep.......Question that I am asking. These LED experiments are important on shedding new light, (pun intended) on the best possible methods of creating said light from said LEDS.  Buuuurpppp. 

Back in the 1980-1990's we were introduced to RF/Fluorescent light bulbs, which proved to be much more economical than incandescent or standard ballast triggered Fluorescent bulbs. If the search for O/U results in higher real efficiencies, then all the malaky is worthwhile.

In the meantime I just like bright lights,, ,, and whirrrring motoors,,,,,,  KneeDeep!.....

From the Toad who Hops

[DrZLowe7]

How totally unpredictable .. hahaha

Oh the great Stifeler has decided to punish us and make us wait ... lol .. get out of here .. are you guys still buying this malarky !!

Cheers,

Keep on Keeping on ...

Dean

KneeDeep...Yeh, I'm sort of buying the malarky. Me, I don't believe in O/U. But each jump for the impossible, brings within reach the newly possible. We all know that LEDS are more efficient than Incandescent Lamps in terms of Lumens per watt, but is direct current versus RF excitation the best means to get those lumens per watt?

That is the....KneeDeep.......Question that I am asking. These LED experiments are important on shedding new light, (pun intended) on the best possible methods of creating said light from said LEDS.  Buuuurpppp. 

Back in the 1980-1990's we were introduced to RF/Fluorescent light bulbs, which proved to be much more economical than incandescent or standard ballast triggered Fluorescent bulbs. If the search for O/U results in higher real efficiencies, then all the malaky is worthwhile.

In the meantime I just like bright lights,, ,, and whirrrring motoors,,,,,,  KneeDeep!.....

From the Toad who Hops

You are correct whether DC or some kind of driver may be more efficient is yet to be seen.

I was only breaking the Stiffler schematic down into parts for understanding its operation in a private email that got posted. No more no less. I just do not like to have my break down called "crap" by Stiffler. I did not challenge him making LEDs turn on I was only explaining the operation of it. He was asked many times to explain the circuit and did not. So I did. He has tweaked the circuit to operate the best he can and made improvements. But the basic circut operation is the same.

[hartiberlin]

Hi All, the cores from Dr. Lowe have arrived, but as I am mot home until the weekend I can not yet experiment with it yet. Stay tuned. Regards, Stefan.

[canam101]

I would like this to be for real as much as the next guy but, so far, according to everything I have read here, it is just an ordinary rf generator lighting up some diodes, with zero evidence that it is OU.

If stiffler ever offers real evidence and enough information for people to replicate the circuit, or provides sample devices for people to test, then I guess we will know for sure one way or the other. But all he does, as far as i can see, is play games, the latest one being the 'big announcement' that he was going to make, but will not make because somebody dared to be skeptical.

He sure as hell doesn't sound like somebody who really has invented a world-changing device.