Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

Started by hartiberlin, October 11, 2007, 05:28:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

zaydana

Hey guys

I don't know if you saw my post a few pages back, but I outlined a way which unless I am mistaken should measure if the circuit is OU, and by how much, and also takes into account any perceived brightness vs. actual brightness discrepancies.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3457.msg59449.html#msg59449

Stefan: would you be able to give the experiment in the above topic a run through with your coils? I think it would go a long way towards putting some hard numbers towards exactly how much this experiment is OU.

- James

hoptoad

Quote from: zaydana on November 18, 2007, 02:08:09 AM
Hey guys

I don't know if you saw my post a few pages back, but I outlined a way which unless I am mistaken should measure if the circuit is OU, and by how much, and also takes into account any perceived brightness vs. actual brightness discrepancies.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3457.msg59449.html#msg59449

Stefan: would you be able to give the experiment in the above topic a run through with your coils? I think it would go a long way towards putting some hard numbers towards exactly how much this experiment is OU.

- James

KneeDeep... Sorry I missed that post.     ......KneeDeep
Still, I think that measuring the light output in any given LED against a known "standard" is a good place to make comparisons. Astronomers are expert at this!  Maybe one could pop in and put in his/her two cents worth...KneeDeep .......That is if we can drag them away from their black holes! LOL  :D

If there is such a thing as "Cold Electricity" which doesn't act like "ordinary electricity" then trying to make output and input comparisons on the basis of Voltage and Current readings would be erroneous and fruitless. The only common link between all the different circuits, and a standard in series DC circuit is the "light" emitted from the LEDS. All else in the circuit/s is/are a variable, but the light emissions are something which can be measured in a standardized manner.

If there isn't such a thing as Cold Electricity, then all that is needed is an accurate measurement of Lumens/unit area, and power input to determine a Lumens per Watt for any given circuit.

All I wish to know is whether RF excitation is capable of actually outputting more Lumens per watt, than straight DC using LEDS???
To know that requires a method of measuring the actual light output, not the electrical power output.
For that I wait in anticipation of further results from the "do-ers" , Bless them all!  :D

KneeDeep from the Toad who Hops  :)

zaydana

I understand what you say about cold electricity making measuring current/voltage fairly useless - I've actually taken account of this in the experiment I proposed. Basically, the idea is that you get the same waveform going through the LEDs in both cases, and have a look how much input power goes through either the driver circuit, or the plain LEDs, for the same light output.

The reason this works even with the effects of cold electricity taken into account is that with your plain LEDs circuit, without Dr. Stiffler's driver, you know there is no cold electricity. Knowing how much power it takes to drive the LEDs to a certain brightness under a certain waveform, you can then measure the amount of operator input into the driver for the same brightness, with the same waveform through the LEDs, and can instantly tell how much the system is over unity.

Remember that what we are interested is the amount of environmental input for a given operator input - this experiment is for measuring just that.

abassign

@Xee

If Xee was right I would be really happy, great areas could be illuminated using impulses LED with elevated frequency (MHz). A camera measures the number of photons with an integration equal to the time of exposure. it is important that photons don't  saturate the sensor. It is possible to make a test putting out focus the camera and exposing in non automatic way. To this point the image, in the single pixelses, it will report a measure of the intercepted photons.
However I have the feeling that the circuit of Xee both type impulsive, therefore with elevated spike of current. A LED can be drive, for brief times, with strong current and therefore to send an equivalent light as a continuous feeding. This is particularly true for the LEDs to elevated brightness.
I would want that Xee measured the current and tension that it passes through the LED, with an oscilloscope, so that to have a real measure of the consumed power. If this affirmation is true, we can illuminate the world spending 1% of energy. Unfortunately I believe that is low probability.

AhuraMazda

Quote from: RStiffler on November 17, 2007, 06:13:40 PM
Quote from: dean_mcgowan on November 17, 2007, 06:01:27 PM
Jester ???

6 replications and 0 publications ... yes I agree the Jester will be apparent soon  ::)

The thick plottens :P

Gee! does not your post explain why there are no publications. What is the old saying, "you can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink'.

We have all learned our lesson from your type of distraction. So many people suffer because of your inference. Do you by chance work for OPEC?

@Ron,

He is a minion in some Illuminati controlled organization.
His name appears in the the year book. Need I say more?
www.sigep.org/documents/journal-spring-2007.pdf