Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

Started by hartiberlin, October 11, 2007, 05:28:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

hoptoad

Quote from: amigo on November 19, 2007, 10:20:35 PM
I'm not sure why is everyone obsessing with measuring things and calculating numbers.
In the pursuit of scientific understanding, fortunately or unfortunately, there is a need for empirical recording and measurement.
In everyday life, this helps us to make every day choices. If I were a "petrol" head and didn't care about the cost of fuel, then comparing for example how many miles per gallon a car achieved wouldn't worry me or influence my decision to buy it, but for the rest of us budget conscious, eco-concerned types, miles per gallon is a high consideration. If I want to buy a fuel efficient car, I need some sort of empirical basis upon which to compare two or more vehicles in order to choose the correct one.

Same goes for possible lighting systems. I would want to install the system which gives me the most Lumens per watt. I wouldn't care less, as an average consumer, where all those Lumens came from, so long as I thought it was "green" and the most economical.

I hate figures and calculations, but in the end they are important. Supposing you think you have such an efficient circuit that it must be more efficient than any other method. How do you prove it. By empirical comparison.

As I've stated before, choosing what you are going to measure and compare seems to be the hard part here, and the choices may be crucial to many questions and results in these experiments.

KneeDeep.....I think all the bright lights are make making me dizzzzzy.......

Great work everyone! Cheers from the Toad who Hops :)

hoptoad

Quote from: amigo on November 19, 2007, 10:03:00 PM
Unfortunately I must report that the effects present on the aluminium backed board are not there on plain vanilla one.

The neon bulb does not light on the white vanilla board and so there are no HV effects or anything of that kind. That circuit seems to operate on ~2.06MHz here, while the one with the aluminium board half of that frequency (~1.09MHz).

I noticed that all the LEDS were lit up O.K though. This could be a blessing in disguise! No HV and still all LEDS lit up?
NO HV means SAFER!
KneeDeep......Great stuff Amigo  ;)

zaydana

Thanks hoptoad for your explanation of why measurement is important - I was trying to figure out how to put it, and now I don't have to. :-)

As to figuring out what exactly we want to measure, I think for the moment we need to measure the amount of environmental input for a certain operator input, i.e. the amount of cold electricity/radiant energy which is converted to "useful" energy, per watt of electricity we input.

As far as I can tell, the way to do this is measuring the excess light emitted by an LED in an SEC circuit compared to what they normally would emit with the same input signal. The energy difference is the amount of radiant energy which the LEDs are converting to light. Just to be clear, by 'what they normally would emit', I am referring to their output without the radiant energy which is added by the SEC circuit. This could for example mean the output of the same LEDs, driven directly by the function generator. This experiment will only work however if the radiant energy is not converted to electricity in the SEC circuit, but is converted to light in the LEDs. If the SEC circuit converts radiant energy directly to electricity, the experiment may not show anything. As a result, if this experiment shows excess energy then it definitely exists, however if it doesn't show excess energy, that does not mean it doesn't exist.

You may have noticed that I like to stress the words "same signal". This is because you must be careful of any effects of the input signal on the efficiency of LEDs. If you want to compare a "standard" circuit to an SEC circuit, you must make sure the same signal is going through the LEDs in both, otherwise the LEDs in both circuits may have different efficiencies in converting input energy to light. This would render any actual numbers you get invalid.

While I havn't got the coils or the equipment yet and thus cannot make these measurements myself, I am working on getting hold of the needed materials, and aim to make these measurements ASAP. The important thing about these measurements is if the SEC circuit does indeed facilitate the conversion of radiant energy to light in the LEDs, these measurements will show it, and therefore give us some hard numbers.

If anybody has the know-how and the equipment, it would be great if they could try and make some of these measurements before I get around to it...

derricka

Hi Harti, and Dr Stiffler,

I have created a preliminary (non tested) printed circuit board design for the "Thomas oscillator" version of the cold electricity circuit (marked for non commercial use.)  I would like to share this here, but  am hoping both you and Dr Stiffler review it first. (  Ron's email address is probably private)
I have created this in PCB Express (free download), so anyone could email the design and have a board made at low cost (without parts installed).
Cost could be under  $10 each (shipping extra) if we shared a big enough order.  Anyway, just let me know where to send the data file, if you are interested. I may be able to do other versions as time permits.

DerrickA

Branko

I suggest replace LED's with 4 diode (1N4148) and capacitor for energy measurement. I use that way for measurement.
If you have battery input, easy is measure P=U*I (just measure current, voltage is from battery).
In my (HF) experiment, I measure time for charging capacitor to 50 V voltage (for safety reason). On 470 uF its discharge has good spark (don't go up with charging).
Energy in capacitor is E=0.5*C*U*U, and it is in J = W/s.
See on my web, how easy is with 3W input (car hand lamp electronics with 1 transistor), charge that capacitor without wires in 60 second, and collect around 0.5 W/s energy.
Here in my experiment is input 3W/s, and every 60 second output is 0.5 W/s. Little energy, but great spark.

I write (in some post) that 1 AAA battery can light up 50 LED for 1-2 hours, with HF converting of 1.5 V with some FET converter.

Try to measure your real output. It is important...
"Nikola Tesla and My Thoughts":
http://free-ri.htnet.hr/Branko/index.html