Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[Shanjaq]

Ya i noticed that today...   Pardon me while I storm off yelling potent obscenities that make the paint curl off the walls....

[plengo]

btw, could anyone invalidate his maths and claims via real experimentation and rigorous test?

I see a punch of guys complaining but no work of their own, good or bad. A few guys on the right track such as Stefan, Amigo, me and some other, but the noisest of all are just thin air. 

Fausto.

ps: an old saying: show me your work and I will know who you are.

[DrZLowe7]

btw, could anyone invalidate his maths and claims via real experimentation and rigorous test?

I see a punch of guys complaining but no work of their own, good or bad. A few guys on the right track such as Stefan, Amigo, me and some other, but the noisest of all are just thin air. 

Fausto.

ps: an old saying: show me your work and I will know who you are.

Maybe some could but Stiffler said you can no test for cold electricity using conventional means. I seen on his site oscilloscopes, volt metres, etc.I seen no home made special testing devices.  Where was he getting his numbers from and how?

[plengo]

since no one will answer my questions above, I will:

N. Tesla wrote that radio receiver take power from either but not from
radio station transmitter. The consumption power of transmitter is not
increasing when many receivers are in operate. This is the way for creation
of information in space-time that can be used for transformation it in power.

This is from:
Alexander V. Frolov   email: alex@frolov.spb.su
P. O. Box 37,  St.-Petersburg,  193024,  Russia

I still think RF will NOT produce the power necessary to run the LEDs. RF is only the EFFECT of it. It is somehow allowing the energy to come from some place else. RF will "amplify" the space-time deformation and allow the EFFECT (current and potential) to manifest in the little closed loop circuit of the LEDs so that they will be excited to the point of emitting light.

In my experiment when I connected the Func.Gen to an inverter connected to a battery, it was using so much X power but when the LEDs were lit (because of th correct frequency being set) the power usage went "DOWN" not up. Anyone can reproduce this. Dr. Stiffler is still right in his claim of "amplification".

I think we can create something that will "amplify" this EFFECT of the RF over any coil of "matter" that has intricic connection with ZPE (zero-point-energy or vaccum) such as an inductor. But if you only invest time and brain power.

Fausto.

Anyone to refute this?

[plengo]

@DrZLowe7,
you right. I have heard Bedini saying the samething before but he also said that those are the tools that we have. They don't show the full story but effects of it. An example is when he (Bedini) talks about the "pulses" or radiant pulses that on the osciloscope is shown as spikes of 300v or more but they manifest theirselfs as real energy inside an lead-acid battery. He even goes to say that those pulses or spikes as synonymous to "radiant spikes".

We can not see air, but we can measure its effects on things. Until someone come up with a better tool.

Fausto.