Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[hoptoad]

What really matters is the difference between the light emitted for a certain voltage/current signal with Dr. Stiffler's circuit, and the light emitted for the same voltage/current signal without it. ..........1

If this circuit has overunity as claimed, then i'd wager the key is that the LEDs are being powered by something new which we can't measure directly. However, knowing what amount of light the LEDs should emit without the new energy source allows us to indirectly measure how much energy is coming from the new source..........2

@Amigo - while you sound particularly averse to numbers, i'd say you'd be the prime candidate to try and make these measurements. You seem to have gotten pretty decent results, and if you could show that the LEDs are emitting light which isn't coming from the measured current * voltage, then it would go a long way to understanding what Tesla discovered a hundred years ago.........3

And if it turns out there is nothing and the numbers are all what current science predicts, then what the hell. At least we tried. And theres nothing stopping us from keeping on doing so............4

Above quote slightly edited

1 KneeDeep    2 KneeDeep   3 KneeDeep    4 KneeDeep........That's 4 yep I agree's from me........KneeDeep

[k4zep]

Regardless of Dr. Stiffler's reasons for taking down the web site and videos, I would still like to thank him for what he did share with us, as this took both time and effort.
It's not easy being a trailblazer, and many  have had their new discoveries misunderstood, mocked, ridiculed and endlessly questioned.
And just as there are plenty of people out there who would blow out your candle, just to make their own look a little brighter, there are people willing to help shield your flame.
The secret , as in football, is to ignore attempted tricks of distraction, and keep focused on the goal.
So to Dr. Stiffler, this may be a tad premature, but I would like to say thanks, and Merry Christmas!

Hi All,

I keep an eye on the list, Email with Dr. Stiffler each day with ideas, test, etc.  My shock and surprise to see his site down, his videos missing from Youtube, etc. this morning.

I have not Idea what is going on or his reasons for  he is his own man. I do realize that the number of "Armchair" engineers and the theories and comments would irritate anyone even if he had the hide of a rhinoceros!

I came up with the simple blocking/Armstrong Osc. that he named the "Thomas Osc."  Just seemed to be simple enough and did what was needed.  The other simple Osc. is as good I think and was designed by Ossie in AU.  I have built probably 200 versions of this device, all sorts of low pass filters to measure/detect/quantify the output.  Working with what appears to be in its simplistic form RF, is difficult to measure accurately in the 0-2 watt range.  It is one thing to build what you think is a OU device, it is another thing to PROVE it.

There is a common thread here in all the OU circuits I have seen in the last 10-15 years.....the only problem seems to be in tying the Knot. 

I'm off to a Thanksgiving vacation till Sunday night here on the East Coast of the US.  I've closed the door on my 2X4 shop and am going to be a armchair engineer till then.  Good will to all and keep at it.

Ben K4ZEP

[dean_mcgowan]

Often the victim tries to defend the perpetrator of a crime ... strange I think .. but for some reason it comforts them to identify with their assailant ..

Thought for the day

[MeggerMan]

I keep an eye on the list, Email with Dr. Stiffler each day with ideas, test, etc.  My shock and surprise to see his site down, his videos missing from Youtube, etc. this morning.

That was lucky, I saved the entire ce4 page on Monday night, so who wants a copy of the zipped up page with images (5Mb)?

@Zachary,
Parts have arrived OK - must have gone via the Antarctic.

I started the Thomas oscillator circuit last night on a small breadboard, should get it complete tonight so I will post pics.


Regards
Rob

[starcruiser]

@Bolt,

I think your theory has merit, can you start a thread for this so we can explore this theory? maybe a few diagrams to go along with it? I think I have a visual of what you are saying but would like to explore this more. Just to say, I saw the same thing with the small torrid and was wondering if this was the oscillator and the large torrid was a air core transformer using the single wire method Stiffler was using.

Just to put my .02 in, a small experiment I performed was to wind 32ga magnet wire (about 200 turns) on a 1" PVC form and drive this with an old tube based audio signal generator (positive lead only). I also wrapped 10 turns of 18ga stranded hookup wire over this in a bifilar manner (all coils use the rh rule, all coils wound the same direction). it was noted that the 32ga coil produced a field (using frequencies in the audio spectrum), I noticed this when using a neo magnet near the coil to see if this affected operation, the magnet was actually affected, i.e. wants to orientate itself to the generated field when no actual return path was connected.

Anyhow, there is more here that requires exploration.

I found this interesting since the signal applied was basically audio (swept from about 5khz to about 200khz manually)