Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[dag57]

@ anyone...login on Doc's website...how do we register for a user name and password....    PS Great research  Dr.stiffler...i have really enjoyed the thread...i will continue to read and study your work...Thank you, dag

[aether22]

Hopefully Stiffler will see fit to fill the significant? interest in the 3rd Gen SEC's with his new breakthrough, but incase or until then is there any way that someone could breadboard a SEC?

The one challenge in answering yes to that is of course the variable inductor, and so what would be of great interest is if someone who had a working SEC, especially a breadboarded SEC could try various commercially available variable inductors assuming the right ones can't be located.

This should keep replications of this coming which is what everyone (including Stiffler) wants.


As for the new 22uH choke, I guess it's a case of collecting energy from, or giving disturbance to the aether, perhaps Stiffler is skeptically playing with my observation that flux impressed on aether seems to become, well to borrow a popular term 'radiant'?


Oh, sorry for my new large sig in advance, I will prune it in a while but if you don't like it just ignore it.

[fritz]

As for the new 22uH choke, I guess it's a case of collecting energy from, or giving disturbance to the aether, perhaps Stiffler is skeptically playing with my observation that flux impressed on aether seems to become, well to borrow a popular term 'radiant'?

Dear All,

As far as I see the SEC phenomenon - there is no proof so far that
the phenomena relate to _non_ maxwellian activity.

Near field RF is always difficult to handle - especially the electric-magnetic
interaction (without doing comprehensive investigations including elliptical
differential equations) - and simulation of such setups almost impossible.

If we assume that the near complex rf field leads to a coherant interaction
in all involved parts (phase of frequency compounds are "locked" to each other) -
than these field/current would have special properties.

In that context - I would line up the SEC phenomena with Keely devices - where
the "locked" frequency compounds have interesting features. (but in that case
electrical - not mechanical)

In traditional "EE" you try to avoid those effects (like hell).
This is the reason why a proper build up prototype would never work.
(built to avoid the effects)

rgds,

fritz

[aether22]

Dear All,

As far as I see the SEC phenomenon - there is no proof so far that
the phenomena relate to _non_ maxwellian activity.

That is only because you are either ignorant of all of it's effects or your analysis is unbalanced, no one here has any interest in 'debunking' the circuit as you seem to have interest in.

If you are not convinced of it's usefulness but still want to find otherwise then replicate it, if however your interest is only to 'correct' our misconception then please just leave as we have no interest in your opinion/correction.

Of course I may have misinterpreted your intention.

In that context - I would line up the SEC phenomena with Keely devices - where
the "locked" frequency compounds have interesting features. (but in that case
electrical - not mechanical)

In traditional "EE" you try to avoid those effects (like hell).
This is the reason why a proper build up prototype would never work.
(built to avoid the effects)

IMO all of these devices however they work, electrical, magnetic, sound, heat or 'subtle' effect ' the vacuum in much the same way and with similar principles.

And if you want to simplify the principles for researching anomaly it is to do everything the exact opposite of good practice so I agree with that also.

Principles for good vacuum engineering (aether/lattice):
Current flowing up/down magnetic field lines (this is only a fraction of a larger principle)
Multiphase/frequencies/wave sources interfering  (works with electric or magnetic fields, require sine not sq wave)
Multiple particles up to macro spheres/strips/rings being 'pinged' electrically or magnetically
HV (preferably enough to create speeding particles), Radium, Noble gas, BaFe (especially agitated by sound or fields)
Shorted conductors (if electrically impractical, use in ways that does not involve electrical flow/waste)
Sudden impulse switching, noisy switching and other means of creating noise
Thin wire or multistrand cable
Isolate different parts of the circuit (isolation transformer or caps to transfer power)
Ungrounded (earth grounds can also be beneficial but part of the circuit should not be connected to it generally)
Electrical currents supplied by battery or better, generator (alternator), preferably not mains
Tuning, and not just electrical tuning but more subtle types also.
Magnetic field compression (North North repulsion)
Larger 'home made' cylindrical or parallel plate capacitors with water or air dielectric
Use of a good diamagnetic conductor, Silver (coating) or Carbon. (or possibly a non metal conductor)
Nonlinear, Asymmetric and Biased
Time (accumulation of effect), containment (within magnetic or paramagnetic enclosure, and buildup in water)

And yes that last one was on my list long before Stiffler/lattice333 found this effect, as was carbon which I seemingly inspired the use of from the optical coherence thread.

Possible:
Bifurcation (too little evidence yet but Stiffler sure likes it)
Collapse of charged plasma (It sure seems to but there is as yet a lack of evidence, though it does do something)

And though I can't say it relates to 'spacial' engineering significantly, unshielded motors/buzzers (drill holes or make open ones)

Of course not every principle is suitable in all cases/places obviously, and these principles are in a very condensed form.
There is more but that's as far as I can go without mentioning principles that might seemingly not be plausibly explainable under the lattice model I would assume.

[fritz]

That is only because you are either ignorant of all of it's effects or your analysis is unbalanced, no one here has any interest in 'debunking' the circuit as you seem to have interest in.

Peace !

If I believe in all the effects, outcome, whatever - replication -,
does it harm anyone if I try to discuss the origin of the effect -
or is this just holy grail/radiant/whatever dogma.

As far as I follow this thread its not clear if the "magic" happens
because of the SEC _OR_ the interaction with SEC or both.

It would be interesting what you think about my posting - thats
why I did it.

The fact that the calculation of the near field interaction is very
complex - its not prooven that the stuff doesn?t follow very normal
principles.

Why should the stuff you see (spatial matrix or whatever) not comply
with kind of standing wave/bubble interference of a near rf field.
Because its too complicated ?

The outcome of my mail was that _I_ think
====
(this does not mean Im right
or I sell the truth or everything else is stupid -this means that im interested in
what you think)
====

that the special properties of the SEC field/current (not the SEC field itself)
is "magic". And there is no moral or debunking or whatever backthought with it.

we are talking about science, not religion.