Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

Started by hartiberlin, October 11, 2007, 05:28:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

DrStiffler

Quote from: amigo on April 23, 2009, 07:39:00 PM
I am of an opinion that MPSA06 is not necessarily the only transistor that will work, though it is the best one so far.

I have gotten the SEC effect with 2N2222, 2N3904, 2N3905...I have some 2N4401 and will try those as well soon.

Also, with all the testing I have done, I do not believe hFE has major impact on the performance of the SEC (though it might be contributing to its operation). The MPSA06s tried were from several different vendors with a wide range of gains, anywhere from 60 to over 300, and they all appeared to have performed as expected.

Of course, as no real sensitive measurements have been done, it still warrants further investigation and experimentation to determine which ones do work better than others.
@amigo
Read back through this thread and you will see that successful replications have consisted of the 06 transistor and asserting that many others will work without (knowing for sure) will only lead to many failures. So you are able to state this without quantitative results as a reference?

All things are possible but some are impractical.

AquariuZ

Dr Stiffler,

I am trying to access the referenced YouTube videos in this section but they have all been removed by "user".

Next I tried to access your referenced websites and they are no longer online, nor is the one referenced in your profile (parked).

Can you please point me to your active website and videos?

Thank you in advance.

AZ

DrStiffler

Quote from: AquariuZ on April 24, 2009, 06:01:33 PM
Dr Stiffler,

I am trying to access the referenced YouTube videos in this section but they have all been removed by "user".

Next I tried to access your referenced websites and they are no longer online, nor is the one referenced in your profile (parked).

Can you please point me to your active website and videos?

Thank you in advance.

AZ
@AquariuZ
Search YT for 'Dr Stiffler' or 'MRH2O2'
All things are possible but some are impractical.

TheNOP

Quote from: DrStiffler on April 24, 2009, 05:37:20 PM
@AbbaRue

**Interesting how the SEC started out as a Joule Thief with a ferrite antenna instead of a toroid,
and then evolved into what we have on page 226. **

LOL

What? SEC Exciters came from a JT? I know that sun spots are down, but this is ridiculous. Sorry to spoil your dream but the first open ended coil exciter was built in 1995.

Besides happening way before this JT thing was born LOL, how can you even compare the two different systems?
mind you, blocking oscilators date way back before 1995.
it is true that the SEC does not work like a joule thief at all, and both are far from having the same root.
but what is the point of using precedance date ?

i can understand that you don't have time to teach peoples with lower electronic understanding.
but not that you have time to be rude with them.

simply stating "no, the SEC and the jt are different" would have been faster to type and would have been understood by everyone.
competent in the field or not.


DrStiffler

Quote from: TheNOP on April 24, 2009, 06:57:39 PM
mind you, blocking oscilators date way back before 1995.
it is true that the SEC does not work like a joule thief at all, and both are far from having the same root.
but what is the point of using precedance date ?

i can understand that you don't have time to teach peoples with lower electronic understanding.
but not that you have time to be rude with them.

simply stating "no, the SEC and the jt are different" would have been faster to type and would have been understood by everyone.
competent in the field or not.



@TheNOP

Did you know that in the assembly language that a NOP is a do nothing command used to often fill a patch space or take up time uselessly? Humm.......
All things are possible but some are impractical.