Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[DrStiffler]

My blue LEDs have voltage drop of around 2.4 Volts per LED.
I get 24 Volts Pure DC at my 22 uF cap with no Rple at all. But my current is much smaller, less than 1 mA.
But I will built up now a better oscillator and post the results soon.
Have also to use the uptransforming voltage effect of the 2 coils on the ferrite core, so I will get a higher voltage on the LED chain...
By the way, 2.8 Volts drop on a white LED sounds right to me, so I trust in Ron?s measurements.
You already have almost pure DC on the LED chain after the 2 AP diodes also without a big cap measured with my scope, so the LEDs and the connector board capacitance seems to be enough stray capacitance for this.
Regards, Stefan.

Stefan!
Look back a couple of comments I made to EMDevices, all you need is one resistor, one cap and one transistor. Use the 'Thomas' design and leave off the cap from the base to ground.The start resistor can either go to V+ or to the collector. Depending on what transistor you use, start at ~56pf for the feedback cap. the value of this cap has only a very small effect on frequency. Frequency will self center, you do not adjust it. Of course all this is only of you are using the standard antenna coil with 9-10T over the top. With 12V supply and good transistor you should have little problem getting 150V. Don't overload the Plug with huge caps, this is self defeating.

You of course can do what you want, but adding additional coils will reduce your result. The small inner winding capacity of the coils that comes with the core just happens to be the best so far. Many that have duplicated this device have tried winding new coils and as far as I know, all fail to show SEC.

I will no longer use the misleading term OU. For me I will always now refer to it as SEC.

Good Luck, please give this way a shot and let me know?

[DrStiffler]

This one!

Yes! Now I understand. In reality about all I hope to gain out of all this is to be able to publish a paper 'Spatial Energy Coherence' which is indeed my view of what is going on here. If I can in some way get people to stop jumping on me as some kook, when it all is resolved I just may be able to find someone that will publish  'SEC'

Very, very simply put, the interface is capacitive and all matter is surrounded by unlimited amounts of energy in different forms. With a proper interface some of this energy can be cohered.

Maybe as time goes on I may add to this, but would prefer to leave it for a paper, and by that time I could be shown to be wrong in my view. Time and additional duplications will I hope clear it up one way or another.

Sorry I did not understand at first and do wish you would have respected the Copyrights......

The schematic that was posted I got from this forum. Not your web site and sent it in a private email that got posted. I was not copying direct information from your site and I did not know at that time the information was copyrighted. As I never seen an copywright discloser on the schematic or should I say picture. Sorry again. If there was a discloser sorry I did not notice it.

Copyright (c) 2007 Stiffler Scientific. All rights reserved.
Copying of this material is strictly forbidden.
Violation of these Copyrights will be enforced.

Don't know how much clearer this can be?

[DrZLowe7]

This one!

Yes! Now I understand. In reality about all I hope to gain out of all this is to be able to publish a paper 'Spatial Energy Coherence' which is indeed my view of what is going on here. If I can in some way get people to stop jumping on me as some kook, when it all is resolved I just may be able to find someone that will publish  'SEC'

Very, very simply put, the interface is capacitive and all matter is surrounded by unlimited amounts of energy in different forms. With a proper interface some of this energy can be cohered.

Maybe as time goes on I may add to this, but would prefer to leave it for a paper, and by that time I could be shown to be wrong in my view. Time and additional duplications will I hope clear it up one way or another.

Sorry I did not understand at first and do wish you would have respected the Copyrights......

The schematic that was posted I got from this forum. Not your web site and sent it in a private email that got posted. I was not copying direct information from your site and I did not know at that time the information was copyrighted. As I never seen an copywright discloser on the schematic or should I say picture. Sorry again. If there was a discloser sorry I did not notice it.

Copyright (c) 2007 Stiffler Scientific. All rights reserved.
Copying of this material is strictly forbidden.
Violation of these Copyrights will be enforced.

Don't know how much clearer this can be?

I just said I never noticed it. And said I was Sorry for not. The schematic was only resent to person who posted it. It is your sarcastic replies that ticked me of at you in first place. Can you not just take an I am sorry. Resending copyrighted material back to original sender is not in violation of the law. I am tyring to apologize . And make up.

[DrStiffler]

This one!

Yes! Now I understand. In reality about all I hope to gain out of all this is to be able to publish a paper 'Spatial Energy Coherence' which is indeed my view of what is going on here. If I can in some way get people to stop jumping on me as some kook, when it all is resolved I just may be able to find someone that will publish  'SEC'

Very, very simply put, the interface is capacitive and all matter is surrounded by unlimited amounts of energy in different forms. With a proper interface some of this energy can be cohered.

Maybe as time goes on I may add to this, but would prefer to leave it for a paper, and by that time I could be shown to be wrong in my view. Time and additional duplications will I hope clear it up one way or another.

Sorry I did not understand at first and do wish you would have respected the Copyrights......

The schematic that was posted I got from this forum. Not your web site and sent it in a private email that got posted. I was not copying direct information from your site and I did not know at that time the information was copyrighted. As I never seen an copywright discloser on the schematic or should I say picture. Sorry again. If there was a discloser sorry I did not notice it.

Copyright (c) 2007 Stiffler Scientific. All rights reserved.
Copying of this material is strictly forbidden.
Violation of these Copyrights will be enforced.

Don't know how much clearer this can be?

I just said I never noticed it. And said I was Sorry for not. The schematic was only resent to person who posted it. It is your sarcastic replies that ticked me of at you in first place. Can you not just take an I am sorry. Resending copyrighted material back to original sender is not in violation of the law. I am tyring to apologize . And make up.

By all means you apology is accepted. Strange though as it turns out I was not even referring to you on this issue, it was the image of SEC that AM posted. So you must have got it confused and I followed.

**It is your sarcastic replies
I treat how I'm treated. Respect get respect does it not, yet who starts first?

[hoptoad]

No let me show yo a couple of pictures and some very simple math, then we all can listen to what you say is not proof yet. Like did not do this or that, or need to do something else, or faked something, or where are the scope shots. REALLY!!!!

Here is a typical running circuit containing 52 white LEDS.
Now lets see;
52 LED x 0.0086 Series current x 3 volt drop = 1.342 watts
Now difficult, input is 12 volts at 0.078ma = 936mW

MUST BE A REAL MEASUREMENT ERROR HERE!!!

Whether O/U or not, (I'm not here to argue) the pictures and measurements you posted are very impressive!
Great Stuff Dr Stiffler!

KneeDeep from the Toad who Hops