Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Working Attraction Magnet Motor on Youtube!?

Started by ken_nyus, October 15, 2007, 10:08:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

As a matter of fact, @xpenzif demonstrates one practical application of the important fact of CoE violation proven by SMOT in a perpetual motion machine.

rice

i dont understand why would omnibus make such claims when this had been beaten to death by many
including himself

arguing with guy like him is pointless
i have no more to say

Omnibus

Quote from: shruggedatlas on November 24, 2007, 12:58:16 AM
Quote from: rice on November 24, 2007, 12:49:29 AM
why you have not closed the loop?

Simple - the loop is closed when the researcher brings the ball up to B using his hand. Come on, we can all do the Omnibus at this point!

In all seriousness, Entropy had a very insightful point.  The ABCA experiment would look the same even if the SMOT was grossly under unity.  For example, upon leaving C and dropping to A, the ball experienced such a strong magnetic pull from C that it only barely touched down at A, hardly making a noise at all.  Clearly it would arrive at A with barely any kinetic energy at all, obviously under unity.  Omnibus's calculation would not change one bit.  So long as his hand is available to shove the ball up to B, overunity is preserved. Something is clearly missing.
Not so. The loop is closed when the ball returns at A. Please try to learn elementary things before engaging in a discussion. @Mr.Entropy has absolutely no point whatsoever and he, the same way as you, doesn't know what he's talking about.

Omnibus

Quote from: rice on November 24, 2007, 01:01:44 AM
i dont understand why would omnibus make such claims when this had been beaten to death by many
including himself

arguing with guy like him is pointless
i have no more to say
You're a shameless liar. The opposite of what you're saying is true. SMOT has been proven to violate CoE beyond any doubt.

shruggedatlas

Quote from: Omnibus on November 24, 2007, 01:03:24 AM
Quote from: rice on November 24, 2007, 01:01:44 AM
i dont understand why would omnibus make such claims when this had been beaten to death by many
including himself

arguing with guy like him is pointless
i have no more to say
You're a shameless liar. The opposite of what you're saying is true. SMOT has been proven to violate CoE beyond any doubt.

Do you have some kind of pathological need to get the last word, even if it adds nothing new to the discussion?