Working Attraction Magnet Motor on Youtube!?

[Omnibus]

Here's another one, insignificant but willing to be noticed. There are others too. My last posts were provoked by someone pushing nonsense. To push nonsense in a thread like this, discussing important issues can be done only by small minds trying to get noticed. I didn't start this. I want to discuss @xpenzif's motor and how to reproduce it.

[acp]

No Omnibus, you don't discuss anything, you dictate. Although you like to give the impression of being some kind of wonder in logic and physics, you seem willing to accept an unverified video as evidence of your "proof".  When anyone questions your "rigorous analysis" of the smot as tinu did, you refuse to answer anthing or even discuss it, and accuse anyone who questions you, incompetent, lacking in basic knowledge etc. Stating that you don't have time to educate people. You, however, do seem to find plenty of time for posts similar to your last 5 and many other posts from you on this forum, not to mention the posts on steorn which went on ad infinitum : You are a snot.    No, you are a snot.   No, you are a snot and incompetent etc...

[Omnibus]

No Omnibus, you don't discuss anything, you dictate. Although you like to give the impression of being some kind of wonder in logic and physics, you seem willing to accept an unverified video as evidence of your "proof".  When anyone questions your "rigorous analysis" of the smot as tinu did, you refuse to answer anthing or even discuss it, and accuse anyone who questions you, incompetent, lacking in basic knowledge etc. Stating that you don't have time to educate people. You, however, do seem to find plenty of time for posts similar to your last 5 and many other posts from you on this forum, not to mention the posts on steorn which went on ad infinitum : You are a snot.    No, you are a snot.   No, you are a snot and incompetent etc...

No, you are a snot. You are a disgusting snot. Dirty little nothing.

@tinu's "arguments" are ridiculous. These "arguments" have been rejected long ago. Starting with the obvious incompetence of @shruggedatlas, obvious inability of @Mr.Entropy to see that (+mgh1 + Mb) is different from (mgh1 - (Ma - Mb)) and ending with @tinu's obviously incorrect claim that at B the signs in the potential energy the ball has are not as I have shown them to be, that is, (+mgh1 +Mb), all this is a complete waste, disrespect to the fundamentals of science and sheer arrogance. You are another idiot who doesn't understand this, who is incompetent and who behaves as a snot.

As for the video, it is in the process of verification, The process isn't over yet. The jury is still out. Only snots such as you wish it isn't but is real is still out. Disgusting nobodies such as you and several others, including some on the Steorn forum are standing in the way of real scientific discussion and must be confronted. This I have time to do. Go, educate yourself first, don't expect me to substitute for your teachers, learn how science works, and then allow yourself to post posts. Otherwise you'll remain just a snot dirtying an important discussion.

[acp]

No, you are a snot. You are a disgusting snot. Dirty little nothing.

I wasn't actually calling you a snot, I was merely referring to that fact that you like to indulge in this kind of name calling which you have demonstrated so well again. Of course, you may call me a snot from the safety of your keyboard, that is your privilege being an elite member of this forum.

and ending with @tinu's obviously incorrect claim that at B the signs in the potential energy the ball has are not as I have shown them to be, that is, (+mgh1 +Mb),

You haven't "shown" anything, you simply repeat that tinu etc. are wrong and that you are obviously right.

[Omnibus]

No, you are a snot. You are a disgusting snot. Dirty little nothing.

I wasn't actually calling you a snot, I was merely referring to that fact that you like to indulge in this kind of name calling which you have demonstrated so well again. Of course, you may call me a snot from the safety of your keyboard, that is your privilege being an elite member of this forum.

and ending with @tinu's obviously incorrect claim that at B the signs in the potential energy the ball has are not as I have shown them to be, that is, (+mgh1 +Mb),

You haven't "shown" anything, you simply repeat that tinu etc. are wrong and that you are obviously right.

Hey, buddy, you're a liar on top of that. Read you previous post and see once again are  or are you not calling me a snot. From the safety of you keyboard ...

Also, I have shown what I claim I've shown. You don't understand it but that doesn't mean that I haven't shown it. As for @tinu's misunderstanding, it is not to be used as an argument. Confusion and misunderstanding are never scientific arguments. @tinu must be clearly told that he just doesn't know what he's talking about when claiming that at B the potential energy of the ball (+mgh1 +Mb) has the wrong signs. This is basic stuff which a person conversant in Physics knows ahead of time, even before knowing me and my argument. One should know such stuff before entering into the discussions here. The fact that (+mgh1 +Mb) is the potential energy of the ball at B isn't prone to consensus. This is an absolute fact. Science isn't a democracy, it's a dictatorship and facts such as the above dictate. There cannot be equally valid varying opinions about such facts. Therefore, one cannot be polite with people impudently pushing for such facts to be ignored and something stupid to be accepted as truth. You don't understand this and therefore you should restrain from further cluttering the thread with your useless but nasty comments.