Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Self Running Micro TPU, with closed loop.

Started by EMdevices, November 12, 2007, 11:49:58 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

hakware

My Guess would be an FT140 or an FT240.. in a mix 77 it has the highest permiability. It would be nice to try some at each end of the scale
low and high permiability like a mix 61.
.

wattsup

@4Tesla

Thanks for the link.

I think @hakware is right about the Mix 77 since is has the lowest MHz rating, although it is probably higher then we are going, it is the closest.

If you look at my photo of my multiple coils, located here;
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3599.msg60877.html#msg60877

the FT240 would be like the back center coil although mine is slightly fatter, and the FT140 would be close to the back left and right coils. I don't think the FT 240 will be good for this circuit but it may be good for the same circuit working at higher voltages, simply because the saturation current required would be greater. I would say the best choice is the FT 140 77. But I will get a few of both also (just in case).


4Tesla

@ hakware and wattsup
Thank you!

@all
What do you think of the iron toroid cores?  Should I buy some?

Thanks,
4Tesla

eon

cap in coil:

1500uF 16v inside 30/15/7 x 0.6mm insulated tinned copper on unknown core (from pc psu similar to the original em devices model); RC: 1M & 1uF Tantalum, Switching: 2 x BC337 (safety in numbers); LED: blue unknown spec

6v: 5.49min, frequency steady (unknown), more rapid toward the end
9.6v: 7.47min, 0-2 mins slightly faster and dim, 2-7.3mins steady, brighter; last 10secs, brightest and slower.

its like it kinda tunes in as it goes, dont know if this is cause cap is in core, or just the voltage.

components are ripped from old pc for the moment, and i will make two duplicate halves when i have ordered better components.  interested (as others) in different frequencies (not just schumann, but higher?), but also fast switching, bemf and two capacitors...

hakware

@Tesla
I am not sure how the Iron cores are going to work out. they design the ferrite mixes to have the lowest eddy current losses possible. Iron, as I have read would display higher core losses.
Most ferrite cores are an iron, molybdenum nickel mix.

It is up to you. and it sure is worth a try on one. dont leave anything to chance I say.

@eon

The aluminum can/core in the capacitor is changing the resonance of the circuit as the field flux changes in strength.