Some thoughts on how the TPU might work.

[Localjoe]

@Ist
      Did you even grasp the things that i posted? If you are so far advanced why not discuss them and explain why your ideas or what not are so much better.   Misleading comments in the dark help no one. Mine were thoughtful and informative.
                                                                                     Joe

[innovation_station]

why not start where you were told to start then read between the lines

hummmm

this is what i did and this is exactly where this idea came from

i will not give the answers

you must do it for your selfs

its all there in black and white  if your eyes are open to see it

i almost cant be bothered any more with helping this site out anymore than i already have  i am currently building what you see in the pattends  what you all dont see in the pattends is what i have seen in real life and in my mind and what i have designed

so give up secreates  that the world has not seen yet or if they have it is not spoken of

so why post it here so people can make guns that kill

ya i dont think so

ist

im    outtie       

[Localjoe]

@rosphere
        Well its says The Thyratrons did the same function as the new scr's the only diff i'm seeing is it is a vacuum tube as opposed to solid state. The need to go to the quick off state is necessary because of the duty cycle timing 10 on 90 off and the "staccato of electrostatic bursts" that happen in the 10 percent thats on.  Take those concepts and read this sentence twice ... i think we found our answer.

"Currents are induced in relationship to the strength of the magnetic field     *** More wire .. larger feild****              And voltages are induced based on the "rate-of-change of that flux". Rate of change... duty cycle .. 10 on 90 off and a "staccato of electrostatic bursts" that happen in the 10 percent thats it is on.   
Tell me what you think
                                                                                                                               Joe

[Grumpy]

Sounds like I_S has heard some gossip again.

He is correct that a spark gap is not required, nor are mosfets, or tubes, etc. - not that these would not work as they may.

Precision is required, however.

[Localjoe]

You are right grumpy but when i try to understand the workings of things i always like to follow the path once shown and take what wisdom i can from it. To then better understand how those ways were made better and the shortfalls that were experienced along the path...  Just gives ya better picture in your head when your done...   And if your so close minded IS that you cant see that gk's device could be used for many things other than matter disintegration then you should stay in canada and have fun with your teams and secrets hope it gets you somewhere.  And when your outa cell pone range trapped somewhere i'm sure your going to be praying to god that you had one of gk's bfg's to phone home.