Some thoughts on how the TPU might work.

[epwpixieq-1]

Many just want a "free energy" device.  They do not want to learn anything, to discover anything, or to understand anything - especially if they have to work for it. 

well captured    ... I am wondering if there were no TPU will be people willing to learn, I hope yes ...

[nightlife]

Hansvonlieven posted this link on another thread and you all may want to check it out before continuing to argue as some are.

http://www.mondovista.com/meyers/

[Grumpy]

Hi folks!

I just got back from a whirlwind tour of Europe. All work, no play ? still suffering jet-lag but I see terms like ?90 degrees nullifies coupling?, ?bench experience?, and thoughts of no inductive coupling between perpendicular coils.

I can?t be quiet here because I just had these arguments with Dutch, French and German EE?s. While I cannot go into details on the circuits I had to fix because of the ?upgrade? efforts of these people I will tell you this:

90 degree coil orientation minimizes conventional inductive coupling. It does not nullify it. Typical reduction is 30 dB, in ?far-field? RF terms. Of course, most do not think in ?near-field? terms. Coupling adjustment can be obtained by varying the spacing between the coils OR the orientation OR the relative position. Ever hear of ?series and parallel aiding or opposing? or just aiding and opposing coupling? How about the fact that in near-field the magnetic component is dominant NOT the electric component? Old radios made in the early part of the 20th century that used variable orientation between coils to control resonance for tuning? No? I suppose not.

Conventional thought on coupling is to induce a like signal in the secondary. This is good when the coupled coils are parallel. Unconventional coupling is to induce a secondary signal unlike the primary. This secondary signal can only be the resonant frequency (and harmonics) of the secondary coil ? regardless of the primary frequency. This is done with perpendicular coupling.
Granted, the result is weak, especially when the designer continues to limit their thoughts by the book. There is nothing wrong or new about the physics. The book is only a starting point. It is NOT the answer.

The way to enhance the power from the secondary I see as the following:

The higher the primary signal voltage (not Amps) the stronger the induced ?ringing? of the secondary.
If you control the primary pulse width to the point that the primary signal fall aids the ringing of the secondary instead of dampens it you enhance the ringing.
If the secondary is resonate at some harmonic of the primary the energy output of the secondary can be improved without increasing the power drawn through the primary.

It is no different than striking a tuning fork or ringing a bell. No matter what frequency you hit them they will vibrate at their resonance and over/undertones.

If you don?t control the pulse width to aid the ringing it is the same as pushing a child in a swing and not timing your pushes to aid the swinging.

Yes, there is such a thing as perpendicular induction. Maybe there is some secret name for it other than induction. I don?t know. Keep denying it and some poor slob will be forced to fly during holidays and fix the problem.

Every time I see implied ?Laws of Physics? it pisses me off. There are no laws ? only our interpretations of what was written and the interpretations of the observer. Too many seem to think the observations made decades ago just can?t be incorrect or incomplete OR EVEN WORSE ? applies to all variations of phenomena. To that I say ? stay where you are comfortable ? enjoy the show. I?ll be glad to set my bench afire just to learn more. It is already charred.

Bench experience? Yea, right. Have you ever run into an odd signal in a line of amp stages that just didn?t fit the band intended to be amplified? Usually near the BFO or mixer stage? Well guess what. The coils in these ?separate stages? are usually oriented for ?nullifying the coupling? between them. The signal is coming from somewhere. It ain?t just ?noise?.

When you strike a bell with a hammer the sound of the bell is so much louder and longer than the hammer strike. Also it isn?t transverse.

Simple solution to any argument: Prove or disprove on your own bench. Make sure you look close. Do this EVEN if the book says it is true or false. If you did it before under tutelage, try it again and look closer.

I don?t know the secrets to this thing but I?m having a blast learning more. I?m over half/century for some time now and the learning is even more fun.

I can?t wait to see what the South Americans think of some old lunatic running around flushing toilets and recording which direction the water twirls! Only now I also have my little piece of resin to twirl on the desk. So far everywhere in the Northern hemisphere it prefers to go counter-clockwise. This is not possible according to ?The BOOK?.

While I have great respect for work done by many here?.

BOOK thumpers can eat my shorts 

I wish the rest the best of enjoyment of whatever holiday is current or coming for them! After some eggnog I?ll be exploding some caps for goof measure.

BEP     

Best post of the day!    Keep it up BEP!

[innovation_station]

well i would like to help you all out but

as grumpy mentioned things come only with hard work

i have said many things on this site and many things i said were wrong how ever

also many things i have done and said are so verry true lol

there does not have to be 90 deg to get this to work  does a nuke spinn?  lol

go do your home  work as i have done mine 

i had NO  free hand outs on this journey and i learned far more than i really would have though in the process of learning

just too wild!

ist

[Evil Roy Slade]

@Those who believe The Books are bull.

If you had a brain tumor that needed to be removed whom would you choose to remove it.

(a)  A trained and qualified neurosurgeon who had studied a whole heap.

or

(b)  Someone who has casually picked up some nice sounding medical terms from Readers Digest
and intends to use 'common sense' as the basis for brain surgery.


ERS