Testatika, TPU, MEG, etc. amplification principle theory

[f_dyne]

Thank you.

My first question relates to your titling of this topic and your documents.  Are you saying that at the heart of these devices, "Testatika, TPU, MEG, etc.," lies a coil-wrapped-magnet?

Not necessarily.
I am reasoning with the TPU at the moment, because I could say something about Testatika, but only TPU has been patented.
The principle works with a magnetic to electric transposition anyway (please keep in mind that I have been experimenting with electrostatic version only, up to now) for Testatika.
To obtain the magnetic version effect you do not need necessarily a coil wrapped magnet, I used coil wrapped magnet to choose a possible physical layout.
The key is that when you have a 'transformer' action near the coil into the magnetic field with induced current due to free electrons and ions, the field is ever in the same direction because you have the permanent magnet so in one half of the cycle you diminish the reacting electron-ion density while in the other half you have higher reagents density.
When you have this higher deionization effect near the coil you have an effect similar to the normal diamagnetism due to magnetic field applied to a rotating electron but increased; the induced field will be opposite to the magnet field and so at the same time it will vary in the same direction of the varying superimposed coil field, and more field variation will create more voltage, and after 90 degrees more current, on the coil.
You can verify this with precision evaluating the various field, voltage and current verses and phases (not all shown, but all can be determined from the physical system description).
Now my problem is making a good calculation of the electron-ion pairs involved by the magnetic field.

[f_dyne]

It looks like these last 'efficiency' formula I found can give good hints.
The easiest way to obtain good efficiency is to raise the voltage and to lower the current, it seems.

F_dyne

[f_dyne]

New T.E.I. hypothesys

Hi to all.

I found a new theory to explain the single disk machine.
Here:
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/fischerconsulting/singledisk100wtestatikare5.jpg
(I bet you will have to copy and paste the link to make it work)

Explanation:
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/fischerconsulting/TEI.txt

This time it would be TRUE free energy.
I still doubt that the first double disk small machine works this way.

F_dyne
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/fischerconsulting/edgeresearch.htm

[Overmind]

Since thermo-electric cooling is actually working, doesn't that directly counter the current thermodynamics (since the heat actually transfers from the colder metal to the hotter one) ?

[f_dyne]

Since thermo-electric cooling is actually working, doesn't that directly counter the current thermodynamics (since the heat actually transfers from the colder metal to the hotter one) ?

Well, this is one of the things I am addressing.
Transferring heat from colder metal to hotter one should be permitted if global enthropy is increased.
In fact, this actually normally happens in fridges and air conditioners.
One of the things I'm asking myself is: is it possible to transform spontaneously heat energy into electrical energy inside an ISOLATED system?
Apparently, this could decrease enthropy. But I don't know if this can be demonstrated and personally I think that enthropy will not decrease.
I couldn't find (or understand) a satisfying general mathematical explanation of enthropy itself, up to now, to completely explain this.
It seems that enthropy is a useful thermodynamic variable first of all, to be applied in thermal to mechanical conversions.
Can we think that if we convert air enthalphy into metal electron enthalpy the second law of themodynamics would be violated?
I don't think so, in general.
Moreover, electron is both particle and wave so: are we converting exactly from heat to mechanical energy only ?
How will the wave part enter into the enthropic balance ?

F_dyne