Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Muller Dynamo

Started by Schpankme, December 31, 2007, 10:48:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 52 Guests are viewing this topic.

energy1234hope

Just a thought, don't know much about coils. What if romerouk was right in saying skycollection will be the one to get it working. Is it because he seems to have the drive coil and pick up coil in the one as such?????? Litz wire has say seven strands could he use 4 as pick upos and the other three as generators.. What would that do to the coil setup?????

k4zep

Quote from: nul-points on May 17, 2011, 08:17:04 AM
hi Ben

did you catch the earlier posts & link from neptune & me, re: Parametric Conversion (changing inductance)?

cheers
np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com
Hi NP,

Yes, thanks, went over to Energeticsforum and read all the post there too.  Just something to think about.
The scope shot by R is most revealing as far as bias magnets go!  I received all my plastic disc, etc. yesterday, still waiting for my
dye so I can do a accurate layout on it as its been awhile since I did something to close tolerances. 
Try to keep everything to .001". Tedious as I do all by hand, the old fashioned way.
Oh for the shops that several of the folks on this list has, but where there is a will, there is a way, just takes time!.   

Ben K4ZEP

JouleSeeker

  Does anyone know how to reach Rod Clark, a clever inventor of the OHIO area?

His motor-generator was discussed briefly on this thread as one that looks like a Muller-type generator and evidently worked OU from the youtube video that he displayed.  I was impressed.  This man may have some good ideas of how to get things working, based on his experience.  Plus I think he deserves some credit for getting his device working a few years back.

Does anyone know how to reach Rod?  On his website, he has a phone number and an email.  I've tried the phone number several times -- always getting the message "inbox is full".  No response from my email...   I hope Rod is alright.  He was trying to sell his house in Ohio and may have moved.

If anyone has his plans for his device, that would be great to know about, too!  He was selling the plans a while back.
Thanks, if anyone has any input regarding Rod.  I would like to thank him for his work, and learn more from him!   Please  PM me if the info is of a sensitive nature.

Poit

I love that everyone is jumping in building replications (I mean that sincerely), but I feel a more important task would be inventing a tamper proof clear perspex box to test devices like this - just initial thoughts.

For example, a clear perspex box that has the device in question (i.e the Muller Dynamo) running in a self looped fashion that is powering a timer (that has digits for Years, Months, Days, Hours, Minutes, Seconds) that when closed (the box that is) can not be opened again with out breaking the tamper proof seal. Thus (attempting) to prove the device/s longevity of self looping over unity.

THIS is the real challenge.

LtBolo

Quote from: Tudi on May 17, 2011, 03:07:34 AM
Not sure how many places romerouk stated this is a OU device, he did mention it runs for a few hours. That means it is very efficient dynamo ? I don't really care if it is OU, i like the whole experiment :P And i do learn quite a bit from it :)

This is no Joule Thief. You aren't going to run a motor on 10 watts for 3 hours recirculating stored energy. It is OU.

Quote from: Tudi on May 17, 2011, 03:07:34 AM
About those rectifiers at the end of each coil series, if they would be only 1 way rectifiers ( half of the sine wave ), would that help the coil escape the drag ? Would it make the coil to become an open circuit thus not letting it build up a magnetif field in the coil to opose the PM leaving the coil + ferite ?

And since it is OU, the answer to the question doesn't come from a traditional understanding of the problem.

RomeroUK said that he approached the problem as one of efficiency. To me that suggests that he was trying to minimize loading while maximizing output. Somewhere in the process of balancing those two he found a window into the magnet/coil interaction that worked. It might be a special case of parametric excitation, it might be a special case of Dragone's experiments, it might be a special case of Howard Johnson's magnetic gate, or it could be something else entirely. What it isn't, is a conventional dynamo.