Muller Dynamo

[Tudi]

.. The output goes up with them but also the draw goes up the exact amount too...

I think this is the point of the DC2DC converter ( or any other limitation ) to break this chain at some point. No matter how much you put out it is directly eaten up by input. Mechanical friction will eventually overcome to whatever gain you might manage to get from the generator at a specific RPM.

[i_ron]

dayyum - i logged off too soon... and i'd just had my weekly wash AND cleaned BOTH my teeth, too!


are you saying that you can get 5W from just one coil pair when using the somaloy core?

if so, that's a problem which i'd be happy to have! (using a 3W DC motor drive)

i'm not sure why in your post #2091 it reads that you're not seeing good results so far

i guess i missed something (..and not just a hot date!)

all the best
np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com

Ah well, my wife thinks my free energy hobby is for the birds anyway so probably this wouldn't have been a good idea... besides travelling time would probably have killed it, lol

OK, on the "don't do it this way again" list is I only used 6mm side plates and the forces here are extreme... so they just vibrated in and out like a drum.

But the main complaint is input equals output. What is it that R was doing to get Lenz manageable and how to do it?

Ron

Edit: not one coil pair!  one coil

[b_rads]

@all
Moderator: please feel free to remove this post if not applicable to this thread.  For all trying to perform exact replications of Romero’s setup â€" something about this setup has been bothering me for a while and while reviewing this thread last night I realized what it was. 
Let’s play the what if game!
Notice in the picture below that I attempted to draw vertical lines to line up the cores on the coil pair.  They do not line up exact.  If when making the stators, one would think that the first stator would be the template for the second stator and the coils would match better than shown in the picture.  What if this misalignment is intentional?
Let’s say the misalignment is intentional â€" what would be the purpose?  Imagine the top coil rolling up to the rotor magnet and generates current, then stops.  The lower coil would still be generating current and dumping into the top coil.  For a brief moment the top generating coil becomes a drive coil and skips past the rotor magnet.  When the bottom coil stops generating current the top coil core changes to reflect the tuning magnet.  Did Romero figure out a way to bounce current into the top coil multiple times for a single rotor magnet pass while also skipping pass the sticky spot? 
Rotor speed and tuning appear to be major concerns in making this thing work.  The tuning magnet was shown to be sensitive to both vertical and horizontal alignment.  Is that to set the timing between the two coils?  When powering a load, would not the drive portion of the generating coil be stronger? 

What if?
Brad S 

[retrod]

What if indeed! Brad makes a very good point and a stator design should incorporate some precision adjustment in case it's needed for fine tuning. Also, if anyone is as lost as I was about "Somaloy" and such here is a good page describing how it was used in earlier motor designs. Makes it easier to wrap your mind around the coil design process for this project.
http://www.weareonline.com.au/freeenergy/index.php?page=10

RD

[mondrasek]

I think the framing of the picture is just a bit off.  I drew a line along the main shaft first and it was not straight up and down.  Copied and pasted that line to the coil cores and they line up pretty good.  So the whole picture is tilted just a bit and drawing straight up and down reference lines is misleading.