Muller Dynamo

[lanenal]

Let's clarify some points regarding the sensors:
not both of them are using the small magnets.I started originally with both using the small magnets to switch then I tried to move one to get max results.
The second one is facing the big magnets from the top.This one from the top is activated after the magnet passed, the other one on the side of the rotor is activated like 1mm after the magnet passed the center coil.
This is difficult to explain, testing yourself will get you there but do the testing separate not both of then at the same time.

Can somebody who understood the timing please help.

If the driving coil is activated AFTER the neo magnet on the rotor passed TDC,
then the driving coil must be PUSHING the neo magnet away
in order to accelerate the rotor.

Then we are actually using repulsion, not attraction, is this correct?
To use attraction, the driving coil should be activated BEFORE the
neo magnet on the rotor passed TDC.

Another perplexing point in the above post is this:
why different arrangement of the hall sensors give better results?
if moving the second sensor to face the big magnets from the top
will improve performance, why not move the first one in similar fashion?
If so, then we don't need those small magnets anymore.

[Arthurs]

Romerouk and Hello everybody:

    Because my English is not good, A lot of content can only guess, On the multi-strand wire:

1) a recommended 0.8mm multistrand,
2) Another way of saying they recommended 7x0.125mm litz wire,

    But: accurate mapping from the actual point of view, 7x0.125mm litz wire of the total cross section diameter of 0.375mm, And 0.8mm diameter cross section a lot of difference.
    I understand wrong? What is correct?

PS: multi-strand wire in the end is the option of using multi-strand copper wire? or choose to use multiple Enameled wire?

Thanks for helping

[aircore]

Romerouk and Hello everybody:

    Because my English is not good, A lot of content can only guess, On the multi-strand wire:

1) a recommended 0.8mm multistrand,
2) Another way of saying they recommended 7x0.125mm litz wire,

    But: accurate mapping from the actual point of view, 7x0.125mm litz wire of the total cross section diameter of 0.375mm, And 0.8mm diameter cross section a lot of difference.
    I understand wrong? What is correct?

PS: multi-strand wire in the end is the option of using multi-strand bare copper wire? or choose to use multiple Enameled wire?

Thanks for helping

[lanenal]

I am thinking to double the number of coils and magnets too. 3 driving coils will be better.

3 driving coils will allow for a symmetric configuration of the driving coils.
the 6 pickup coils may have more turns to have higher voltage pickups.

[sigis]

Let's clarify some points regarding the sensors:
not both of them are using the small magnets.I started originally with both using the small magnets to switch then I tried to move one to get max results.
The second one is facing the big magnets from the top.This one from the top is activated after the magnet passed, the other one on the side of the rotor is activated like 1mm after the magnet passed the center coil.
This is difficult to explain, testing yourself will get you there but do the testing separate not both of then at the same time.

Hello Romero,
I would like to ask what is exactly position, dimensions, type and polarity of small magnets?
thank you!