Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Muller Dynamo

Started by Schpankme, December 31, 2007, 10:48:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 58 Guests are viewing this topic.

nul-points

hi all

well this is a turn up for the books!....


i believe that the unfortunate gentleman in that Neo Gen video, Rod, cracked it several years ago!

no-one told him that he had to do what Romero did,
so Rod used:

- only one stator level
- no stator mags
- rotor mags N S N S
- no odd/even coil/core ratio (8 coils / 16 mags) & (also a 6/16 ?)
- no neos
(he used 'other' mags - thank-you, khabe!)
- no pulse drive (he used 12V DC motor from VCR)
- no Litz (he salvaged solenoid coils from relays)
- small rotor (probably 5")

what WAS the same:
- coils each into FWBR
- all FWBRs in parallel

i fully believe he achieved CoP > 1 - but probably only just over

so, he may not have had enough extra energy to run an extra load & use a DC converter to stabilise his motor drive


i'm not saying that this is the only way ahead - or that what Romero did was 'unnecessary'

i believe that Romero discovered how to overcome the limitations which left Rod with an extremely interesting Proof of Principle, but which in Rod's case, didn't really show that this technique can generate sufficient excess to completely take the battery out of the equation and also provide some useful additional load power

the work which both Rod & Romero have done, gives us great confidence that the original work of Bill Muller was entirely valid and that much more powerful machines can be built using this same effect (eg, R. Classen's rep; Thailand rep, etc)

it seems to me at this moment that the 2nd 'so-called' Law of Thermodynamics is very close to getting a major overhaul - and severe 'surgery'

as the character Sherlock Holmes liked to say, when quoting William Shakespeare:

Ladies and Gentlemen - "the game's afoot!"


Romero, God bless you, mate!

np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com

"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

Tudi

@nul-points : yes, but that video only posted voltage ? There are hundereds of DC-DC converters. We need to measure Wats not Volts or just AMPs

nul-points

Quote from: Tudi on May 14, 2011, 03:35:19 AM
@nul-points : yes, but that video only posted voltage ? There are hundereds of DC-DC converters. We need to measure Wats not Volts or just AMPs

yes Tudi

but the point is - he only NEEDs to measure voltage for his simple demo because he is using two similar batteries - running from one and charging the other

he is not trying to give a definitive proof - in the space of  a 'short' video he is only trying to demonstrate that he can charge one battery at the same time as the other battery is running the machine

i agree that more careful and rigorous proof is necessary - but basically he is giving more or less the same 'proof' that Romero did - ie. here is a method which enables a machine to both run itself and provide some extra energy to a load

it's now up to us to take these methods forward, discover the variations, get an idea of the underlying effect(s) - and provide that more rigorous proof

the 2 battery method is not Rod's only version - he later uses only 1 battery and re-charges that whilst running just like Romero's video JUST BEFORE the self-run

i'm saying that Rod couldn't get as far as the Romero magic & whip the battery out AS IT RAN - because Romero learnt how to overcome the limitations which were holding Rod back

i think this shows that the underlying effect is a lot less 'complex' than we thought (eg. look at the 'what was different' list in my previous post)

the complexity comes in scaling up the effect and generating higher levels of power - as Romero did compared to Rod

hope this answers your comments?

np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com

"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra


nul-points

Quote from: FreeEnergyInfo on May 14, 2011, 04:22:09 AM
INFO....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lNWRM-UsYI&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFhUYJGuTFo&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaGgfr-oF6E&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

LOL FreeEnergyInfo has been trying to indicate this to us for some time, quietly compiling a set of videos & images of devices which have successfully used some aspect of this effect

greetings FEI
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra