Muller Dynamo

[Dave45]

I hope Romero doesn't mind if I post this here, he say's to leave sw 1 open until max rpm is reached, notice that is what he does when running his rig.

[wattsup]

<sup>@ALL

You see again some of the problems when following a build that is obviously tricked by the maker. He builds it, it does not work as he wants. He tricks three videos, then others build the exact same device with the same hindrances and yours again does not work as wanted. Then you think the problem is your replication. BUT IT IS NOT. It is simply that with your replication, you are now at equal footing to Romeros initial build and the drawbacks you see, he sees as well, except that he tricked his videos to make you think his worked and yours does not. Then you start to think there is a "SECRET" ingredient and since he will not come clean and admit his actions, you are left holding a bag full of holes.

I know some will ask "What do you mean he tricked the three videos". Well, recently I indicated at OUR that even in video 3 showing the wheel suspended as it turned, well, you can see in that video that Romero had removed the resistor from his two drive circuits (wow he never mentions that) because otherwise he could not run it with only one or two 9vdc batteries hidden in his dc converter box. So, given he removed resistors on only that video and the simple fact that his dc convertor box was closed and not open to see inside also disqualifies his video of any credibility. Note that he keeps the resistors on Videos 1 and 2 because in those videos the wheel and load was directly battery driven.

So the final question is how to advance the base idea (which don't forget may be flawed from the starting base design) into a working device since so many are now stuck with a Romero wheel.

I am convinced that someone with a build should start a new thread entitled "Going beyond the failed Romero design", so guys can from now on just concentrate on getting such a system to work instead of replicating a system that had failed from the start. This way any newcomers will not have to wade through endless pages. The new thread would be accepting of the fact that Romero screwed everyone royally and that from this point on the only other alternative is to try and make it work using well oriented brain power and not his lie stimulated bullshit. Sorry to be so hard but the reality is what it is.

I am now convinced that when I put Romero against the wall, he then quickly showed us his real fancy photo of his bigger wheel with nice big fat coils that will again produce nice big fat drag if he finished that device, which he did not. I now think the photo shown was his last attempt to try and add to his credibility by showing us dumb rabbits a bigger carrot but instead I now realize it was also to say, "This is my big, fat and EXPENSIVE device, but, I will not continue it or finish it until you guys help me figure out where I went wrong in my previous build".

So, actually, in the final analysis, those that think the Romero Videos are real will never be able to help Romero because you are only trying to equal his obvious but well orchestrated failure. Only those that realized he faked his videos and are willing to still advance this potential design with newer or more advanced methods will be of any use to him. Like in real sports, some in the OU Olympics use steroids and what a game they play.

wattsup

PS1: Copy this post because I think it will be removed soon enough.

PS2: I will not post here anymore. Only on a newly opened thread. I had a few orientations to add but will not here.</sup>


edit by moderator: Wattsup, please stop that non-sense. Did you see my short videos clearly showing no cables on the cap? If you don't want to build a Romero motor, fine go away to your own thread. THIS THREAD IS FOR EXPERIMENTAL WORK not debunking. CASE CLOSED.

[mondrasek]

Thought I would add that I also notice a huge difference with the backing magnets.  The backing magnets *appeared* to work better on the bi-fi coils, but this testing was done only after I had moved the coils closer to the rotor by one screw pitch.  I did not check the wave forms between the single filer and bi-fi coils after the move so they may not be outputting the same so don't take that as certain yet.

But here are some results just for the bi-fi coils with and without adding magnets to just one of the coils (not both in a pair).  All tests were on the same maxed out motor input voltage so should have the same input except for any increase due to drag that I cannot measure yet.

No Mags No Load
8.95 V o/p @ 2251 RPM

w/ Mags on one coil only No Load
9.88 V o/p @ 2272 RPM

No Mags w/ Load
5.29 V o/p w/52.4 mAmps @ 2086 RPM

w/ Mags on one coil only w/ Load
5.98 V o/p w/ 56.0 mAmps @ 2069 RPM

Placement of the mags is very critical.  Too close and voltage will drop.  If the magnets are in contact with the ferrite cores, voltage drops dramatically!  Ideal magnet placement appears to be just where the magnet is not pushed away by the rotor magnets and not yet attracted to the ferrite.  Then the strength can be increased by adding more magnets up to the point where voltage stops rising.

M.

[darkwanderer]

Hi darkwanderer,

When I click on your links to the pictures my Firefox browser reports an error that it cannot find that url and strangely it points to this: http://www.yukle.tc/    while your link starts with http://img385.yukle.tc/images or img389.yukle.tc/images etc  so what is wrong?  Maybe at my side?

Gyula

I reuploaded the images thanks for the feedback

[mondrasek]

Here are the actual scope shots of the single coil pair voltage and current, with and without a load.  You can see an almost perfectly flat zero current trace with no load.  With the load the current is only drawn when the coil o/p can exceed the FWBR voltage drop + voltage in the dump cap.

The load is greater than the o/p can handle so it also greatly distorts the voltage trace.

Thanks,

M.