Muller Dynamo

[mariuscivic]

Hi Kone and all!

Been a bit busy experimenting and learning the UFO's new motor design but after watching the 2h 30min video from Peter Lindeman , I moved on bulding an attraction motor.
From my point of view thsi motor has big potential if build right.
This is my replica and tell me what you think
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAgGUeF8WGM&feature=youtu.be

[woopy]

Hi Marius

thank's very much for sharing your great work.

Just a question

are the cylinders attached to the rotor magnetised ?? (i mean are these  cylinders  ,neomag or other kind of magnets )

because if they are. the motor is no more a pure attraction motor, as the rotor is somehow magnetised and of course produces a counter electrical motive force (CEMF ) or other sayd BEMF.

That came to me when you brake your motor with your fingers ,  it seems that the amp draw increases, which should not be the case in a pure attraction motor as P. Lindemann.

And bravo to link this motor to UFOpolitics by utilising the Flyback spike to light the incandecsent bulb

Thank's for answer

and Bravo for your great experiment

Laurent

[mariuscivic]

Hi woopy! 

The bars on the rotor are pure steel; I put them there to increase the attraction between the armature and the stator coils.
NO magnets on the rotor ( except  for the small ones that triggers the hall).If were any magnets on the rotor then it would have the coging effect ; it would not spin so smouth.

The reason that the motor draw increases when breaking is that at low rpm the triggering magnets are staying a bit longer in front of the hall sensor; this charges the stator coils even more and when the field colapses the output is greater.
In other words, the slower it spins, the higher the output.
English is not my first language so if I did not expres myself to good please tell me.

[Scorch]

Just a quick update.
Haven't done a lot with my muller dynamo lately.
Did try the stargate motor as the primary mover but didn't do much after I wasn't immediately blown away by the performance.
And already decided I am taking the wrong approach and now selling the complete stargate conversion on Ebay. (see: www.ebay.com/itm/150894442898 )
I was far more impressed by the performance of using one coil pair as the driver controlled by a mechanical switch and cam. (see photo)
(Cam is simply a cam cannibalized from a GM V-8 distributor and switch is a modified defrost timer.)
BUT I am not happy with my construction, or my coil windings, and continuing to have issues with coils coming loose from the stator plates and, luckily, this has never happened while the unit was running. They just keep coming loose when I am working on it. (see photo)

SO; it's back to the drawing board for another build.
Going back to the basics with smaller coils, without cores, in an attempt to build a system similar to the QC motor/generator at www.quantamagnetics.com
Or, if I ever have the funds, would actually like to purchase one of his kits.

That is all for now.

}:>

[Scorch]

Not quite sure what advantages might be of a rotoverter but I did find some of his other videos to be very interesting including the magnet only linear motor as well as his hybrid combination of "stargate motor", Howard Johnson ramp, and Pulsed coil that appears to be running on capacitors only.
See:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoLbphJkxMM

And now he is offering the "QC motor/generator" which has one interesting feature in that his switching circuit charges itself therefore no outside energy needed to power the electronics.
See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnGBSil-2Rs

Sure would love to see some specifics on this setup including diagrams and schematics.

}:>

Hi Guys,
How about this?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZDBtFLotbg&feature=player_detailpage