Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[vipond50]

I wish I could join all of the replicators in this effort to reproduce Al's machine, for now all I can do is lurk and maybe offer my 2 cents.

@vipond50
I've been thinking.  The so called stators in this device are not really stators at all.  They are in reality smaller rotors.  If this machine is to self run there must be an imbalance of forces and this imbalance must be sustained.  If the machine were built without friction or inertia it wouldn't have a chance of imbalance.  By putting the additional bearings on the rotating stators the rotational drag of the stators must have increased creating more of an imbalance thereby improving the performance of the machine.
It is my guess that the ratio of rotor to stator rpm's should be 4 to 1 and that your measurements of this ratio would indicate slippage of the desired AGW lockup.

FWIW

Ray

Hello Ray
Yes i agree, Chaos or in balance is a key point, but Friction or to much of is a killer. There has to an in balance with any magnetic rotating device for it to operate. Constantly seeking magnetic equilibrium.

Regards
Bill

[ken_nyus]

repost from steorn to my request for a translation...

"    *
      CommentAuthorDirtfarmer
    * CommentTime1 minute ago

permalinkquote
@geodanz...
...Implies an asymmetric field for reasons unknown... The "symettry" traces show the uninterfered waveforms, of rotor and stator, but the dual trace shows quite a different trace for "upspin", and "downspin" (als' parlance...)
Intriguing.
Goodwill,
-Dirtfarmer

http://yirkha.fud.cz/steorn/alsetalokin/Dual%20Trace/

If someone could confirm for me please, these are traces of magnetic polarity?

Magnetic polarity represented vertically, and time horizontally?

[vipond50]

Hi Bill,

Good to know our bearings work, since we have the identical ones.  I agree that this is the first thing we change.  Super precision run about $6.00 each.  I think perhaps super precision, stainless steel, eh?

Which magnets have you got for the rotor?  Have you ordered any N35's?

I would like to see a drawing of how you used two bearings for your stators.

Great job!!   

Bruce

Hey Bruce
my mags are N42's 1/4" dia X 1/4" long, I stacked them(four) i did this so i could have some adjustably
I will post a stator disassembled for all to see the config.

have U come up with a non magnetic bearing from Mike" Even SS would be better that the all steel ones we are utilizing.

Regards
Bill

[Omnibus]

@ken_nyus,

Seems that the original positioning with the three stators and two almost opposing stators give better results. Here are some very preliminary results I just obtained for the original 3 stators positioned as in the video. When rotor spun by hand (no AGW attempt) average spin down time of five attempts is around 15s. Same initial spin (~300rpm) with successful AGW of one of the stators (the leftmost from the video), the two other stators held non-spinning, average spin down time for five attempts around  35s. Again, these are just preliminary results.

Spin down time of a lone rotor (no stators) -- about 220s.

[RunningBare]

Don't be so sure. If he were my employee or a grad student and I knew his current behavior that won't be so and I'm not alone in that.

His current behavior is his own personal business, so long as he does not connect his employers name to this then his employer has no recourse to discipline him.

As I already said, alsetalokin is an anonymous internet persona, I'd say his real life integrity and job are quite intact would'nt you?