Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[geodan]

Omnibus,

You yourself seem a little evasive regarding posting even a simple pic of your rig ... umm why ?

And please dont say quantative something something quantative bla bla bla quantative etc ...

Cheers,

Dean

Keep your opinions to yourself. Quantitative results have their meaning in science and if you don't know that it's your problem.

It wasn't my opinion it was a quantitative analysis of how many posts you have made stating you have a replication compared to the evidence that you have.

Cheers,

Dean

That's a silly use of the term 'quantitative'.

As for me posting scientific data, I always prefer to post or publish such data when there's something worth publishing, some contribution. Some people enjoy making videos and pics showing every step of the construction and there's nothing bad in that. That's not my style, however.

Would you guys mind taking that outside?

[dean_mcgowan]

@ Omni,
I see, I am silly and you are doing scientific research.
I can work with that ...hahahahah

Cheers,

Dean

[supersam]

@omnibus,

and this from the scientist that has brought all of this to us by, unashamedly, provoking alsetalokin to post the video against his wishes.  HA!  i think al may have had a great mentor, that is very pissed at him at this time!  thanks for all that you have done to prove a belief!!  it seems to really be working for you.

oh by the way, i hate to violate your since of integrity to the scientific community and all, but since you brought it up, can you show us a video or some pictures of your set up that is accellerating?

lol
sam

[Omnibus]

Just to add a bit. Many here have noticed how adamantly I'm defending the violation of CoE by SMOT. Because this firm finding is of utmost importance for the field and it's rigorously proven, I'm presenting it at every point of the discussion I find appropriate. I assure you I'll do the same with the results of this replication should they turn out to be of any scientific importance. For now, I've only seen qualitatively promising effects and in order for one to defend them vigorously (as I defend the conclusive analysis for the violation of CoE by SMOT) one has to explore these effects more thoroughly and quantitatively. To show such effects qualitatively, short of an outright acceleration, never mind qualitative, as in @alsetalokin's video, is premature.

[Omnibus]

@omnibus,

and this from the scientist that has brought all of this to us by, unashamedly, provoking alsetalokin to post the video against his wishes.  HA!  i think al may have had a great mentor, that is very pissed at him at this time!  thanks for all that you have done to prove a belief!!  it seems to really be working for you.

oh by the way, i hate to violate your since of integrity to the scientific community and all, but since you brought it up, can you show us a video or some pictures of your set up that is accellerating?

lol
sam

No, I can't. Read above why. As for @alsetalokin showing the video, that was the most natural thing to do having made all these claims. I'd show a video such as this any time and will defend it vigorously, not cowardly agreeing with my enemies accusing me of fraud, as @alsetalonkin did when some poor slob started posting abusive videos on youtube. If I were his mentor I'd really be pissed with him and I'm not alone in that.