Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[Omnibus]

I don't understand all this talk of frequencies. Are you guys trying to work out if another motor can be heard "beneath" the audio of the rotor and stators?

The plot thickens!!

Don't think so. Most of us here are working unassuming, trying to figure out how to replicate the device as close to the original as possible.

[Yadaraf]

.
RE 144 Hz

RANT Alert!  Proceed with extreme caution!

You're either gonna love this or hate this.

Recall that Al's stators were spinning at 1700 RPM before accelerating to 4700 RPM.  Recall that we've analyzed Al's audio and determined that his device produces a characteristic frequency of ~144 Hz at 1700 RPM and ~174 Hz at 4700 RPM.  I reported a finding on the significance of 174. 

While "144" is a very significant sacred number (it's all throughout the bible), I found something else that made me jump out my chair.

Here's something to ponder:   

... Q:  What is the atomic mass of Neodymium?


OK .. I'll tell you ... it's 144 (for the unstable isotope).  The relative mass is 145.  Freaky.   

There might be more to it, but I need some high frequency data [from Ken?].

Cheers, 

Yada..
.

[Omnibus]

@Yadaraf,

That's just a fortuitous coincidence.

[Yadaraf]

I don't understand all this talk of frequencies. Are you guys trying to work out if another motor can be heard "beneath" the audio of the rotor and stators?

The plot thickens!!

baobab68,   

When bearings rotate they make a noise -- bearing chatter.  Often, spectral analysis is used to determine if a bearing is worn out and needs to be changed.  We're using bearing noise slightly different here -- sort of in a reverse-engineering effort.

Basically, Al's machine produced a few characteristic noises, which we have quantified.  If we intend to build a device like Al's, then it's logical to assume that our device should "sound" like Al's.  For example, the fact that Al's device produces 144 Hz at 1700 RPM probably tells us something about the bearings that we should use.  As a minimum, I think it provides a target to shoot for.

My background is both scientific and "non-scientific."  If you watch LOST, I am 50% Jack Shepard and 50% John Locke, which is why I seem to go off on tangents.  Because no one can explain "why the device spins," however, and because we live in interesting times, my "tangents" might be pieces to this very strange puzzle.  Who can say?

Cheers,   

Yada..
.

[Yadaraf]

@Yadaraf,

That's just a fortuitous coincidence.

Omni,

You've read my posts.  I'm "out there."  I just bought an asbestos suit today, for use when I'm taken to the stake to be buned. 

I've been an engineer and scientist long enough to know that science doesn't have all the answers.  Just look at the latest discovery in which scientists were able to detect a photon at the target before it left the source.  Physicists acknowledge that they don't understand what's going on at the quantum level -- it's "magic." 

I think the WhipMag uses magic.   

Cheers, 

Yada..
.