Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[RunningBare]

What makes Omnibus a Zealot? This appears to be free energy. Anyone who would be upset to find out that it is "free energy", has real issues.

Errr, I dont remember calling omnibus a zealot, obsessive maybe but not a zealot, anyway I've said too much off topic already, back to the OCAL.

[Omnibus]

@g4macdad,

Indeed. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Well, hope you can understand why ...

[Bruce_TPU]

I ordered my bearings today.  I chose the flanged ones for the center rotor.  A tad more expensive but probably will be worth it.  Add a few drops of oil and they are good to 48,000 rpm's.  I was already speaking with the bearing guy about future upgrades, and once the unit is actually up and running, we hope to replace all of the bearings, first thing, with precision bearings.  Rated rpm's about 100,000.  It simply means less friction. 

But we want to use the same type of everything to start with.  Get it running first, before changing anything! 

Cheers,

Bruce

Bruce
Thanks for putting that post relating to the R3 bearings. I called and spoke to Mike (Nice Gentleman) and ordered the bearings. At the time he had not acquired any info relating to the Flange bearings, so went with the un-flange.
Man i have never waited on parts for a project like this one, Karma ?
I will be ordering again from that company (Mike).

Anyway thanks again
Bill 

Your welcome Bill.  The flanged bearings for the rotor stator only cost about an additional $1.00 each.

My thinking on this, is that it is of importance enough, for me to spend $17.00 USD for new, good bearings.

I also want to make sure that the base, rotor, and magnet stator holders are made out of the exact same material that Al used.  Now, if Clanzer's motor works, and he has used, identical (or so it appears) material for base and rotor, then that will alleviate some static electricity theories.  I just want to take no chance.  If it does work by producing it's own static electricity, it makes no difference to me, because IT WORKS.  LOL

I for one, wonder if he discovered the "Steorn Effect", or something solely new.  It will be interesting to see.  It will also be interesting to see the faces of folks looking at this thing spin without power.  Especially at the University where I work.     

@ Omnibus
I did not bother to price the precision bearings, but they will not be very expensive.  The bearings are small.  (For Now!!    )

EDIT:
I found this great post by Al, from yesterday.  Lots of info and details.

"Every time I have actually seen it stop, it does so by the "dropping out" of the spinning stator. It seems to run at an almost constant rpm until that happens. Spontaneously? Due to some perturbation? They turn off the Jacuzzi upstairs? I don't know.
But I can say that the slow linear decay to zero rpm, isn't the way it seems to behave. Of course I do not have any data at all past about 3 1/2 hours, and I expect it to be able to run for about 1 day 15 hours, or 39 (say 40) hours, thanks to the math models that have been worked out, and based on my conjecture that there may be as much as 17000 Joules available for momentum change, per run.

As for the acceleration when I stop the 2 "idler" stators: I feel certain that this is due to the reduction in drag. It takes energy to rotate each part of the unit, clearly. When the stators are stopped, the energy that was expended in keeping them rotating is now available to the rotor, and it speeds up until again, the power output is equal to all drag and friction sources."

[vipond50]

@btentzer

Yes I totally concur, for the small change involved for this project, why go with used Stuff? I also am repilcating as EXACTLY or as close to Al"s device as I possibly can. When and IF I get the device to motorize I will be headed off to the University Physics lab to run more tests. There I have the nessecary equipment to hopefully obtain the true nature of the operation of the device. But first things first 
At this point i do have my ideas on how and why the device is operating, but I will not elaborate until i have data to back it up.
Did Mike have an Idea when he would have the info on the SS bearings?
Rambling
Thx
Bill

[tinu]

Omnibus,
Read my post more carefully. I was saying that you are not a zealot or Pharisee. I have seen you get continuously attacked so the defensive attitude is forgivable.

Omnibus is not being attacked.
He just pretends to have a proof that he simply hasn?t. What he does have is a limited understanding of SMOT and a huge ego. But little science indeed. I?d guess his skills are somewhere around to those of a high-school teacher but not a brilliant one. I?d be curious to know about his real credentials?

Anyway, the story is long and this issue is off-topic here. But if you want to find more, just ask Omnibus politely to show you where is the CoE violation for SMOT ?proved beyond any doubt?. And you?ll see and understand for yourself.

Cheers everyone and sorry for deviating from the topic.
Tinu