Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

Started by Craigy, January 04, 2008, 04:11:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 34 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bruce_TPU

@ All

From the Steorn Forum.

       MeggerMan:
        @Al, one question/test for you, if you stack two of the rotor magnets in a plastic tube in repulsion, what is the gap that seperates them?
        I know the gap from a N42 1/4"x1/2" rod.

        Regards
        Rob


Al:
    I would really like to know the answer to that one also.

Good test.
Almost exactly 3 cm, maybe a rch more, like 3.05 or so.
Of course, density is unknown.

Meggerman:

Hi Al,
Thanks ... 30.5mm sounds very close to the results for a N42:
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m25/kingrs/DSCN5262.jpg

31.5mm by bouncing the magnets and looking at the average.
The tube is Kapton, so its difficult to see through.

Perhaps its N40?
[edit] by adding another 1/4" x 1/4" rod (total = 1/4" dia x 3/4") to the bottom magnet increases this to about 33mm [/edit]

Regards
Rob

Al:
@Rob--maybe, I just don't know. I don't think so though, they certainly don't seem as strong as the 834DIA stators.

(I have highlighted the important points that I see.)

Figure this out and we will have working replications.  IMHO.

Cheers,

Bruce
1.  Lindsay's Stack TPU Posted Picture.  All Wound CCW  Collectors three turns and HORIZONTAL, not vertical.

2.  3 Tube amps, sending three frequency's, each having two signals, one in-phase & one inverted 180 deg, opposing signals in each collector (via control wires). 

3.  Collector is Magnetic Loop Antenna, made of lamp chord wire, wound flat.  Inside loop is antenna, outside loop is for output.  First collector is tuned via tuned tank, to the fundamental.  Second collector is tuned tank to the second harmonic (component).  Third collector is tuned tank to the third harmonic (component)  Frequency is determined by taking the circumference frequency, reducing the size by .88 inches.  Divide this frequency by 1000, and you have your second harmonic.  Divide this by 2 and you have your fundamental.  Multiply that by 3 and you have your third harmonic component.  Tune the collectors to each of these.  Input the fundamental and two modulation frequencies, made to create replicas of the fundamental, second harmonic and the third.

4.  The three frequency's circulating in the collectors, both in phase and inverted, begin to create hundreds of thousands of created frequency's, via intermodulation, that subtract to the fundamental and its harmonics.  This is called "Catalyst".

5.  The three AC PURE sine signals, travel through the amplification stage, Nonlinear, producing the second harmonic and third.  (distortion)

6.  These signals then travel the control coils, are rectified by a full wave bridge, and then sent into the output outer loop as all positive pulsed DC.  This then becomes the output and "collects" the current.

P.S.  The Kicks are harmonic distortion with passive intermodulation.  Can't see it without a spectrum analyzer, normally unless trained to see it on a scope.

vipond50

Quote from: Omnibus on January 20, 2008, 04:21:33 PM
@CLaNZeR, @Craigy, @vipond50 and everybody else who has the replica of the motor, could you please check what the strength of your rotor magnets is with respect to the strength of the stator magnets? Also, is the movement of the rotor exhibiting a uniform repetitious patterns (four for a full turn) when you turn it by hand?
Hello
I did a count by hand a found that the stators rotate four(4) rev's/ one(1) rotation of the rotor. Has there been a standard for determining the magnet gauss? Read about various methods, but no standard that everyone can follow to get accurate results when compared.

Need to develop a procedure for this
Thanks
Bill

Omnibus

@btentzer,

I think that's crucial to know. As I said my rotor magnets are N42 the same as the stator magnets (these were recommended: part#'s D48 and R834DIA). It appears that the D48 cylinder is stronger than it should be. I found this site where they sell weaker (N38) 1/4" x 1/2" cylinder magnets: http://www.engconcepts.net/List_Of_Cylinder_Magnets.asp. See part# CYL0175. Do you have any other suggestions?

Matching of the magnets is another important thing to do but we'll worry about this later. Let's find out first what these darn magnets are.

Omnibus

Quote from: vipond50 on January 20, 2008, 04:36:21 PM
Quote from: Omnibus on January 20, 2008, 04:21:33 PM
@CLaNZeR, @Craigy, @vipond50 and everybody else who has the replica of the motor, could you please check what the strength of your rotor magnets is with respect to the strength of the stator magnets? Also, is the movement of the rotor exhibiting a uniform repetitious patterns (four for a full turn) when you turn it by hand?
Hello
I did a count by hand a found that the stators rotate four(4) rev's/ one(1) rotation of the rotor. Has there been a standard for determining the magnet gauss? Read about various methods, but no standard that everyone can follow to get accurate results when compared.

Need to develop a procedure for this
Thanks
Bill
Please try the following--adjust by hand the rotor at one of the larger maximums and let it go. It should skip the next rotor magnet and will bump into the maximum formed by the third. That's the pattern that should be repeated. See if it is indeed repeated four times per full turn.

As for the procedure of measuring just place the probe on the face of the magnet pole and compare the readings with what you'd get by placing the same probe on the same place on the face of a pole of another magnet. That's very rough estimate but will give you some idea.

Yadaraf

Concerning Sacred Geometry and the WhipMag

OC's original design called for 13 stator magnets.  AL's device consisted of 8 rotor magnets and 3 stator magnets.

Using Sacred Geometry as a reference, a better system might be achieved using the following:


       8 rotor magnets + 5 stator magnets = 13 TOTAL magnets


I contacted an expert in sacred "systems," and he provided an "8-5-13" inference in the link below.

     http://www.neweaglesforum.proboards107.com/index.cgi?board=news&action=display&thread=1192185297&page=40#1200827437




Cheers,

Yada ...
.