Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[Jdo300]

Hi guys,
watched a program the other night on sky tv about the sun, when they started talking about 'free magnetic energy', the magnetic lines are in constant motion and get twisted and wound up like an elastic band when these break or re-attach somewhere else thay can release all that stored up twisted energy 'like an explosion', anyhoo, could the lines of force from the stators to the rotor get twisted up and then release it all giving the rotor a nice big spin?

Yes, that phenomenon is called magnetic reconnection and is one of the properties of the 90 degree gating force describes in this article here: www.fdp.nu/free_energy.asp?book=90. Check out the section about QMME (Quantum Mechanical Molecular Energy). It is what Howard Johnson believed was the driving force behind his magnetic systems.

God Bless,
Jason O

[Omnibus]

I am not sure you understand what this is about. If you have never experienced a phenomenon and/or believe that science is the holy grail, it would be hard to understand. There are many holes in science and people have an emotional attachment to their beliefs. As someone who has been sitting idle and reading all these posts for the past few days, I cannot begin to understand all that has been going on. I do know this. Even if this was not true, it would only validate your beliefs. On the other hand, at least to some of us believe there are a lot of anomalies that happen that science cannot explain yet. If you are trying to discredit us, that won't happen. Negativity will not stop progress.  You make it sound as if you have a greater understanding about this because science knows everything and that is what you believe. I do not wish to disrespect you in any way, but please give us a chance to prove you right by not posting unless it is has revelance to the focus issue, there by giving you a quicker route to your ultimate goal.

Regards,
B
B

What you're saying isn't enough. Bare statements don't count in science. You have to prove your claims which you haven't.

[hoptoad]

What you're saying isn't enough. Bare statements don't count in science. You have to prove your claims which you haven't.

Unless your poster name is Omnibus!

[Esa Maunu]

@Esa Maunu,

No, that's not only far-fetched but outright impossible. Radiation, if we can speak of initial charging at all, amounts to loss of energy, not gain.

I am talking about the shape of the created pattern, that is able to collect energy from the environment, if that pattern is in a correct form.

Esa

Unless you propose a concrete model, that sounds frivolous.

It is a question of the nested, cylindrical EM fields around the device, that are able to collect charges from the environment. Every inner cylindrical EM field is little closer than the next outer field. When phase changes in a field, the charge moves towards the center of the system. To create such a fields, we need to have a prime numbers ( 1, 3, 5, 7 etc ) of the sending units around. This way it is not possible to create subharmonics patterns, but harmonic patters are possible and those harmonic patterns exists in a distance 2 x radius , 3 x radius etc, around the device.

Esa

This requires spending energy, the device (if what we see in the video is real) generates energy.

I see that it is difficult understand this phenomena. Sorry.

Esa

No, yours isn't a phenomenon but just some confusion you have.

This is a phenomenon, measured  for exsample by Roschin & Godin when they build the SEG replication.

http://www.searlsolution.com/evidence2.html

Esa

[Omnibus]

What you're saying isn't enough. Bare statements don't count in science. You have to prove your claims which you haven't.

Unless your poster name is Omnibus!

Not at all. If I make bare statements of the sort that fellow did, they won't count either. You are slandering.