DEBATE THREAD

[Bessler007]

mah-ha-ha ha-ha, I see the polyphase mind matrix reconfiguration contraption is producing the desired effects.  I feel the power!!  From now on people will think what I want them to think!  Yeah.



Bessler007
Cmdr, BHS
mib HQ

. . . The truth is though that you can't make someone think what you want them to think. . . .

[PolyMatrix]

@Bessler

Proof? As @DA suggests

[Bessler007]

• Unfortunately, this isn't a peer-reviewed archival medium of the type some of us are used to. This is a new medium to exchange ideas, characterized by its brevity and patchy nature and one has to have followed the whole trend of discussion throughout the months and years. That's too bad but that's how it is.

This is an interesting point.  The forum is peer-review but maybe not the sort thought of when the term is used.  The difference might be "who's your peer" when you're here.  Yes, some of us really drag down the IQ of the entire body of peers.

It seems to me that if a complicated point is worth making it should be put at some site one has control over, that people can be referred to when asking about the matter.  That would save people the time of rooting through clutter of a long rambling thread.  Then they would be more able to examine the basis for the point and add to the discussion.

That would be an efficient manner to handle this "proof a SMOT exhibits a violation of CoE".


PolyMatrix,

It would be very nice if there were some repository of a proof as DA suggests.  I couldn't agree more.  Good show, DA.

Bessler007

[Omnibus]

No, the forum isn't peer-reviewed.

[PolyMatrix]

First we have to define a peer