DEBATE THREAD

[Bessler007]

The goofy dude here:




wrote a runaway popular science bestseller A Brief History of Time.  I think he has sold over 10,000,000 copies so far.  I'm real certain a book written around the theme of a violation of the 1st Law would outstrip his sales.  He might have made 2 or 3 dollars per copy.

I personally could bring a book to market so fast your head would spin, Omni.  We could work on a 10-90 split unless you would prefer not to be soiled by filthy lucre.  Then we could do a 50-50 split and if you like you could donate you're 1/2 to charity.


Bessler007

[psychopath]

This is an absolute fact that everyone reading should be apprised of.  There is no proof of a violation of the 1st Law offered in any fashion by any degreed physicist in any peer-reviewed publication in the world at a level visible with the naked eye.  Not one.

Here is another fact.  Any physicist that had a cogent argument supporting any violation of CoE would (upon publishing such a proof) become a world renown physicist.

One final fact.  Any physicist claiming to have a proof yet refusing to publish is a liar.  There are a few corollaries to these facts.


Bessler007

Nice "facts" that you've just established. You say "Any physicist" would become a world renown physicist in showing a violation of CoE. I disagree. Even if a physicist does discover a violation he will most likely stay quiet about it, releasing it would seriously risk his career and reputation, he will likely become a "crackpot".

"Any physicist claiming to have a proof yet refusing to publish is a liar"

You have already made the assumption that violation of CoE is completely impossible, since you are saying an actual proof is not possible.

You are clearly implying that a violation of CoE is absolutely impossible. 

Stop treating mainstream science as a religion.

[PolyMatrix]

Mathematics is derived from Phyicis or from the real world. Pure Maths basically contemplates theoretical posibilities.

[Bessler007]

any point you want to make, make it, but don't give me reading assignments.  I have things to do.


Bessler007

Things are much more complicated than you present them. You should speak, for instance, with @Demosthenes fro Steorn forum to learn more.

[psychopath]

I have things to do.

For the past two days you've consistently been trying to debunk the smot, without any evidence whatsoever(other than witty posts with pictures of disabled people).