DEBATE THREAD

[Omnibus]

@dumbass,

the only thing i have done, is try and help you advance your cause by asking you to supply real numbers.  finally someone has attempted. 

lol
sam

Now why would Omnibot want to prove his theory, his pleasure is gained in the argument and calling everyone incompetent.
The strange thing is that intuitively the loop can be closed, but in practice as we have seen so many times it is not possible.

Restrain from sharing your incompetent rants. The thread is cluttered as it is to deserve more stupidity splashed on it.

[psychopath]

@dumbass,

the only thing i have done, is try and help you advance your cause by asking you to supply real numbers.  finally someone has attempted. 

lol
sam

Now why would Omnibot want to prove his theory, his pleasure is gained in the argument and calling everyone incompetent.
The strange thing is that intuitively the loop can be closed, but in practice as we have seen so many times it is not possible.

Not possible? You take the failures of hobbyist inventors as experimental proof that looped smots are not possible?

It's like saying 120 yrs ago that "Many people have failed to produce a flying machine in practice, therefore it is impossible".

Let me guess, you also think there is nothing left to invent?

[PolyMatrix]

The last link that I posted had numbers in it!!

[RunningBare]

Not possible? You take the failures of hobbyist inventors as experimental proof that looped smots are not possible?

It's like saying 120 yrs ago that "Many people have failed to produce a flying machine in practice, therefore it is impossible".

Let me guess, you also think there is nothing left to invent?

Actually I believe a lot of things are possible, unfortunately closed loop SMOT is not one of them.

Using flight as an argument is quite possibly the worst example, since physics and BIRDS proved it possible long before we got off the ground.

So how about you point to a theory other than Omnibots that shows that SMOT can close the loop?

[supersam]

@running bear,

there in lies the real purpose.  to obfuscate the truth!  to make known that any that try are justwrong!  to let the truth die, like a grape withering on the vine!  so that obvious bs can be propgated as science, to obscure the truth. f---- the agents of real truth, let the scientists like omnibus f--- you instead, what difference does it make?  just let the professional bs'ers win.  COE is down for the count because, the professional bser, omnibus said it was, and gave no proof, except bs, and everyone bought it, but me!

yea right, omnibus, i will give you, you are a professional, but at what?  telling the truth about SMOT, i doubt it, because one thing is for certain, as much as you like to spout your algebraic calculations  around, you have never once been willing to do anything but criticise anyone that has asked you to fill in one variable of your so called equation, with one real number.  why?  because you know that the house of cards that it is built on will crumble.  so instead you say to the big bad wolf go away because you don't know what you are doing.  well let me summarize for you.  YOUR ARE THE ONE THAT CAN NOT SEE REALITY!!!!!

lol
sam