Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



DEBATE THREAD

Started by Bruce_TPU, January 19, 2008, 11:07:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

gaby de wilde

Why not debate one of my contraptions rather then the smot.

This one should show you things you don't believe.

http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=524

I have not been able to debunk it, it works much to well for that.

Do remember how you got the innovation all for free before complaining.

Good luck,

:-)
____
http://wind-car.go-here.nl
blog  | papers | tech | inventors  | video

tinu

Quote from: PolyMatrix on January 28, 2008, 07:32:33 PM
Interestingly I found someone else has been thinking along similar lines to Omnibus here
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/smotidx.htm

That experiment is flawed by conception.
It does not measure SMOT efficiency because it fails to measure input energy. Drop from the input is not input energy; think about it.

Cheers,
Tinu

P.S. I thought this thread is for having fun (right?!) and/or for debating other non-technical issues like hidden agenda, role playing, pay lists, indoctrination culture, business growing etc. etc. and other mind-puzzling, smoke-blowing and sensitive issues. Well?
For technicalities on SMOT there is http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3417.345.html . I don?t mind discussing it wherever but you won?t find same people coming again and again to cure the virus spreading everywhere. It is what it does; its very purpose isn?t it?

psychopath

Quote from: tinu on January 29, 2008, 03:42:03 AM
Quote from: PolyMatrix on January 28, 2008, 07:32:33 PM
Interestingly I found someone else has been thinking along similar lines to Omnibus here
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/smotidx.htm

That experiment is flawed by conception.
It does not measure SMOT efficiency because it fails to measure input energy. Drop from the input is not input energy; think about it.

Cheers,
Tinu

P.S. I thought this thread is for having fun (right?!) and/or for debating other non-technical issues like hidden agenda, role playing, pay lists, indoctrination culture, business growing etc. etc. and other mind-puzzling, smoke-blowing and sensitive issues. Well?
For technicalities on SMOT there is http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3417.345.html . I don?t mind discussing it wherever but you won?t find same people coming again and again to cure the virus spreading everywhere. It is what it does; its very purpose isn?t it?


Actually I think this thread is perfect for smot debates, because they are debates, and they don't seem to progress towards an actual working device. I think the other threads should be dedicated to finding new things, and leave the debates to this one.

tinu

Quote from: psychopath on January 29, 2008, 04:29:17 AM
Actually I think this thread is perfect for smot debates, because they are debates, and they don't seem to progress towards an actual working device. I think the other threads should be dedicated to finding new things, and leave the debates to this one.

Yes, it is for debates as title says but not necessarily on SMOTs exclusively.
In addition, into the other thread there is already twice the number of posts that are here; majority is on SMOT and nothing else. There is some very good quality info posted by people I don?t see here.
What?s the point of starting SMOT debate over again or of perpetually changing its place?

psychopath

Quote from: tinu on January 29, 2008, 04:45:10 AM
Quote from: psychopath on January 29, 2008, 04:29:17 AM
Actually I think this thread is perfect for smot debates, because they are debates, and they don't seem to progress towards an actual working device. I think the other threads should be dedicated to finding new things, and leave the debates to this one.

Yes, it is for debates as title says but not necessarily on SMOTs exclusively.
In addition, into the other thread there is already twice the number of posts that are here; majority is on SMOT and nothing else. There is some very good quality info posted by people I don?t see here.
What?s the point of starting SMOT debate over again or of perpetually changing its place?

The smot debate was settling down anyway...

How about a new topic(something controversial), and maybe we could have rules or something as well so it doesn't get insane.