The Tesla Project

[AhuraMazda]

Also as you had mentioned the roles of Inductance and Capacitance as they relate to one another, there special relationship.

@allcanadian,
A few posts back, I came to conclusion that a capacitor is very much the inverse of an inductor.
This was confirmed by another member. Please share your finding in this respect.

[Bessler007]

I just finished reading everything you've ever posted here.  I feel so alive now with this new found freedom to "think what ever I want to."

You're an even smaller minded person than I first imagined by reason of an inability to distinguish your ideas from those of others; parading around like some ascended master cloaked in a tank circuit of a scant capacity and induced understanding of other's ideas resisted by the BS of your very essence.

Truth is if you actually knew what you were talking about you'd build something and prove it.  Smiley faces don't prove squat.  I think my search for the truth of  you has ended.

You know who you are.


Bessler007
mib HQ

[Bessler007]

allcanadian,

How did you measure electrostatic induction?


Bessler007
mib HQ

. . .
When I see this in action I understand the absolute genius in teslas coil, and nobody seems to have a clue just how far Tesla had mastered his art of electrostatic induction or the secrets it holds.
. . .

[allcanadian]

@AhuraMazda

A few posts back, I came to conclusion that a capacitor is very much the inverse of an inductor.
This was confirmed by another member. Please share your finding in this respect.

I would call them complementary components, like brother and sister, one (L) stores energy outward -- the other (C) inward. Together they do what each alone cannot, so they have a special relationship. I think we have not given capacitance and the electric field the consideration it deserves which is what much of this thread will probably cover.

I have a few more pictures
Pic 1 is QC, (Quicky coil) I know it is a monstrosity but it performs its function marginally well.
Pic 2 is a close-up of the coil windings which are not truely bi-filiar as Tesla prescribes and the wire is too large and too little of it in the secondary --- but it is a coil, just not a very good one.
Pic 3 is interesting, this is a scope shot using one wire of the secondary to one wire of the oscilloscope, the thick primary is shorted with a jumper across, and is fed from one wire attached to the LC circuit. Everything is open circuit (one wire) or shorted with a jumper but still produces the interesting waveform on the scope. Keep in mind this is done with a single short duration 12v impulse into the inductor of the LC circuit. The settings are 10v/div @ 100 microseconds, so at this point we could assume there is an electric field at work which needs more study. Next we will attach an oscillator in resonance with the primary LC circuit to produce a continuous series of oscillations, I will be using the method Tesla originally used consisting of a set of contacts above the inductance actuated by the magnetic field.

[Bessler007]

It well could be you are referencing what you imagine to be an inductive discharge to the rf (10kHz) broadcasting from your coil and being picked up by the antenna of your other probe.  You think  you're only using one wire but you're using both.  That sneaky rf is totally fm, dude.  That's a sort of magic.

It also well could be that the induction you imagine to be electrostatic is neither that or magnetic induction.


Bessler007
mib HQ

. . .
Now concerning scopeshot #3, the inductive discharge (250+v) is alternating, we see this in scopeshot #1 and #2 as well using only 1 wire from the scope. But this is supposedly a single inductive discharge from a single 12v impulse? the inductive discharge waveform is in oscillation BEFORE it enters the capacitor, that is changing direction --- alternating, but with what?