Thane Heins Perepiteia.

[Bessler007]

I just emailed my phone number to Professor Zahn.  Maybe he'll call or email something back.


Bessler007

edit:  his resume is 32 pages.   wow.

[dhirschfelder]

I just emailed my phone number to Professor Zahn.  Maybe he'll call or email something back.


Bessler007

nice one thanks !

[Bessler007]

long post
Date:  post from Sciencebase Science Blog on 04 July 2007 11:00:18

• . . . Thane Heins, of Potential Difference Inc, contacted me recently with the claim that he and his company have developed a device based on a bi-toroid transformer prototype that in tests proved to be 7000% efficienta bi-toroid transformer prototype.
• "Your claims seem to violate the law of conservation of energy and Maxwell?s equations of electro-magnetics.?
• Heins talks of how the technology is ?Based on the unique theory of leveraging back EMF and upsetting the power balancing mutual coupling coefficients?, his company has apparently ?developed and produced an operational transformer which exceeds 100% efficiency.?
• ?For a transformer the Law of Conservation of Energy can ONLY APPLY if mutual coupling exists from the secondary back to the primary. The Bi-Toroid diagram shows how this cannot happen and how the Law of Conservation of Energy is violated by simply employing Lenz?s Law and Maxwell?s Equations and controlling flux path magnetic reluctance.? Magnetic reluctance is the analogous phenomenon of electrical resistance, but unlike electrical resistance consumes no energy.
• 
  Heins adds that he and his colleagues ?have coupling from the primary to the secondary. The reluctance flux path in the secondary is lower because either the secondary core area is greater or because we employ core material with a higher relative permeability which results in a decrease in reluctance. When the secondary reluctance is lower - back EMF induced flux from secondary coil 1 must follow the path of least reluctance into secondary 2 and not back to the primary. The primary operates only at magnetizing current levels (reactive current only) and does not draw any non-reactive current from the source. The law of conservation of energy for a transformer requires secondary back EMF to be able to mutually couple back to the primary - but if this flux path is higher it will not be able to do so.?

http://science.blogdig.net/archives/articles/July2007/04/Free_energy_with_magnetic_reluctance.html




Bessler007

[pillager]

sorry...

[Gumboots2u]

I live a couple of hours away and just read this in the morning paper.

Mac