Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia.

Started by RunningBare, February 04, 2008, 09:02:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 66 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 174 175 176 177 178 ... 959
User actions

jacksatan

#875
March 11, 2008, 01:46:32 PM
Quote from: polarbreeze on March 11, 2008, 10:04:53 AM
My conclusion would depend on whether the effect (more output power than input power) had been actually measured or not. If it had been actually measured, then I would have to revise my simulation to explain it. If it had not actually been measured but only postulated, then I would expect those postulating it to be able to come up with a simulation for it.

Now I'm really confused - is there some indication that there was an instance of more power out than power in? The best number I had seen was 3.29 watts in and 1.05 watts out? I'm no engineer, but I would assume that leaves 2.24 watts as waste heat? Did I miss something in the simple math?

polarbreeze

#876
March 11, 2008, 03:31:35 PM
Quote from: jacksatan on March 11, 2008, 01:46:32 PM
Quote from: polarbreeze on March 11, 2008, 10:04:53 AM
My conclusion would depend on whether the effect (more output power than input power) had been actually measured or not. If it had been actually measured, then I would have to revise my simulation to explain it. If it had not actually been measured but only postulated, then I would expect those postulating it to be able to come up with a simulation for it.

Now I'm really confused - is there some indication that there was an instance of more power out than power in? The best number I had seen was 3.29 watts in and 1.05 watts out? I'm no engineer, but I would assume that leaves 2.24 watts as waste heat? Did I miss something in the simple math?

No, I don't think you missed anything. My understanding is the same as yours.

JustMe

#877
March 11, 2008, 04:49:57 PM
Anybody who has only joined this thread recently and has some interest in the current topic of these Frankenformers :) may wish to jump back to page 16 or so for further information about the units, previous testing, software modeling etc.

jacksatan

#878
March 11, 2008, 05:30:37 PM
Is there a pictrure of the entire setup for the test? All that can be seen from the youtube clip are the meters and the coils... I'm just trying ot visualize how all of this relates to the magnets...

JustMe

#879
March 11, 2008, 05:47:45 PM
Quote from: jacksatan on March 11, 2008, 05:30:37 PM
Is there a pictrure of the entire setup for the test? All that can be seen from the youtube clip are the meters and the coils... I'm just trying ot visualize how all of this relates to the magnets...

What you saw is what there is JS.  No external magnets in this one. Again, lots of information earlier in the thread.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 174 175 176 177 178 ... 959
User actions