Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU?

[sm0ky2]

i guess thats one way to look at it.
you can stop building octahedrals now.


myself (as well as others im sure) will continue to experiment with this type of set-up, as it has obvious potential in construction of other systems. It is not a diversion at all, but a tool. one which should be carefully placed on a shelf in the workshop - because it may have a use in the future.

This set-up in particular  has another potential tool,-- which is the chaotic reversal of magnetic flux. Sure - this has been observed in great detail in other designs, but not by most of us first-hand, and definately not with the added advantage of a (near) frictionless "bearing".

Tunnell-Vision only takes you in one direction, and you might not end up where you want to go.

perhaps the tri-force roller gets repulsed out of the gate, which makes the octahedral start  spinning to 'cancel' out the flux at the entrance of the next gate - allowing the roller to enter un-repulsed.

- this may be far-fetched, but its a good example of how something like this COULD BE usefull.
   If you reject everything anyone tries to teach you, what will you have learned?


I think the people who have done work on these projects should be served with gratitude, nothing they have done, posted , or shown us in videos was a "waste of time". They have all given us useful information (wether good or bad).   Let that be known.

[sm0ky2]

A more applicable scenerio would be to attach the Rollers peripherally around the octahedron.

then place Tri-Force Gates around the outside of that.

this would give us less losses in our rotary Tri-Force System.

[Omnibus]

See, it's a free country and no one can stop anybody from carrying out useless experiments. The point here is what is rational to do at this point. I'm not saying all these experiments do not have potential to reach the goal but the efforts should not be diverted towards the easy and obvious stuff such as frictionless bearings while forgetting what the real issue is. These easy and probably fun things to do cannot substitute for the real issues to be studied neither can they be of any help in solving these issues.

[sm0ky2]

See, it's a free country and no one can stop anybody from carrying out useless experiments. The point here is what is rational to do at this point. I'm not saying all these experiments do not have potential to reach the goal but the efforts should not be diverted towards the easy and obvious stuff such as frictionless bearings while forgetting what the real issue is. These easy and probably fun things to do cannot substitute for the real issues to be studied neither can they be of any help in solving these issues.

Yes, i would love to see you get help you your "issues"

[Omnibus]

See, it's a free country and no one can stop anybody from carrying out useless experiments. The point here is what is rational to do at this point. I'm not saying all these experiments do not have potential to reach the goal but the efforts should not be diverted towards the easy and obvious stuff such as frictionless bearings while forgetting what the real issue is. These easy and probably fun things to do cannot substitute for the real issues to be studied neither can they be of any help in solving these issues.

Yes, i would love to see you get help you your "issues"

On the contrary, you are the one to get help with your issues because they clutter a thread devoted to overunity and not to trivialities such as efficient bearings. If you want that to be the issue go somewhere else to discuss it.