Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU?

Started by couldbe, February 20, 2008, 08:45:25 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

Quote from: tinu on March 27, 2008, 08:29:34 PM
Quote from: Omnibus on March 27, 2008, 06:22:25 AM
In the initial state (when ball initially at A) the system has zero energy.

This is unsubstantiated. And plainly wrong.
Of course you won't hire me. You can't. It would need a much higher position.

Don't worry about my position. Worry about your being incompetent.

As for whether the above is "unsubstantiated", don't go further, just take a look at the balance @utilitarian has presented above:

Quotemgh(AB) + mgh(BC) - mgh(AB+BC) = 0
CoE obeyed

and see if there is any non-zero energy term accounting for the energy of the system in the initial state (when ball is initially at A). There?s none, correct?  The energy of the system in its initial state is accepted as zero ? the thermal motion, the energy of molecular bonds, the work to put together the system and to place the ball at A etc. are not taken into account in the energy balance we?re discussing.

Like I said, go learn elementary physics first and then come here to discuss subtleties.

ramset

Well its a good thing nobody here seems to need a job    tomorrow is Friday  pay day what are you guys gonna tell the Boss  this week? you had a peeing contest?
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

HopeForHumanity

I'm just going to say that the generally excepted "I.Q" test is completely flawed. It's based on a strict system of average thinking styles. I took a school I.Q test a long time ago, and it was very inconsiderate of differen't thinking styles. The head psychologist of the school said that I had scored the highest he's ever seen on a particular test (think it was picture concepts). Then above average on verbal, and low on some computational speed test thing. I already knew I was a visual thinker, and infact had a very strong visual memory (not photographic though), but I had it to a degree where the test was thrown off by it. The point is, I can remember the last answere to the picture concepts testing (flag-bell-candle), but i'm not a fast computational guy (like multiplication, division...). So because I suck computationaly, I only got to above average range. I think above average is like 120 - 149. If I had taken a test completely geared toward my thinking style, I would have probably been a "super man". Thats why I have never trusted any sort of thing to measure intelligence, as even intelligent people make stupid decisions. (like hitler, stalin...)
Ron Paul is internet overunity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXnBZd4nyWk

WE MUST STOP THIS! Free energy is being surpressed because of it!

tinu

Quote from: Omnibus on March 27, 2008, 08:46:16 PM
Quote
mgh(AB) + mgh(BC) - mgh(AB+BC) = 0
CoE obeyed

and see if there is any non-zero energy term accounting for the energy of the system in the initial state (when ball is initially at A). There?s none, correct?  The energy of the system in its initial state is accepted as zero...

Wrong, as usual! (Why I?m not surprised?)
The ball placed in either A or B will move to C, hence it has an ability to perform useful work. This is plain fact. Therefore, initial potential energy of the ball is not zero. In other words: there is a non-zero energy term accounting for the energy of the system in the initial state. (And just forget about thermodynamics to avoid heating yourself up; nobody but you brought it into discussion) Can you wrote this initial non-zero potential energy term down or the simple definition of energy is already above your level?

Quote from: Omnibus on March 27, 2008, 08:46:16 PM
Like I said, go learn elementary physics first and then come here to discuss subtleties.

Well, issue is you unmistakably need to talk to the mirror. You really don?t have much in common with physics, despite your doggedness and ability to make some people believe you do. See you again when you can prove that you know what you?re trying to talk about.

Cheers,
Tinu

tinu

Quote from: HopeForHumanity on March 28, 2008, 04:28:51 AM
I'm just going to say that the generally excepted "I.Q" test is ...

I partially agree about IQ remarks. But still wanna hear Omnibus? credentials and/or something placing him back to his real place. He has shown nothing, really, except a very large number of elementary mistakes and a huge fixation about SMOT and magnetic motors that, unfortunately, can not possibly work. How do you really know he?s not a magnet salesman or a humble technician? I wouldn?t mind him to be as I respect anyone as long as respect is reciprocal. But I?m telling that his physics really sucks and he pretends to teach and to command people around when he?s actually a mediocrity in physics. Let?s see some of the real omnibus (I doubt it will ever happen).

Cheers,
Tinu