Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU?

[cub3]

Hi all,
I, have not noticed on here any link toÃ,  Ã, http://freenrg.info/Patents/Mag_Motors/US4179633.pdf

Regards
DenÃ, 

Hi Den
To me thats basically the Johnson gate and motor just setup a different way
Take Care Den
Graham

Hi Graham

Could, this not be an application That is amenable to the Tri-Force Gate?

Kind regards
Den

[Yadaraf]

Hi all,
I, have not noticed on here any link to   http://freenrg.info/Patents/Mag_Motors/US4179633.pdf

Regards
Den 

Hi Den
To me thats basically the Johnson gate and motor just setup a different way
Take Care Den
Graham

Hi Graham

Could, this not be an application That is amenable to the Tri-Force Gate?

Kind regards
Den

cub3,

The patent reminds me of Overconfident's (OC's) latch concept.

... http://fizzx.com/viewtopic.php?t=318&start=0&sid=3447abedaaae417a1cc232c362af691f

Cheers

Yada ..
.

[SeanTheLight]

tri-force gate...wheel?

have the triforce gate start at 3:01 o'clock (for a clockwise rotating wheel), and have it wrap back around to 12:01. triforce gate should propel the wheel for the 270 degrees it is in the area of effect. from 12:01 to 2:59, the weight will fall from the force of gravity. The entire rotation of the wheel is powered, leaving only the gate to be overcome, with the help of gravity.

sound workable?

[Tinker]

@smOky2,

There?s enough said on SMOT in the various threads so I don?t want to get into this again. For me it?s a done deal. If you want to learn more dig for the SMOT discussions. There are quite a few topics devoted to that.

As for the current construction, it seems you have convinced yourself already that it cannot lead to a self-sustaining device. It violates CoE, as many other constructions do but it cannot lead to a working pmm. Do I understand correctly what you just said?

Having it as a toy is of absolutely no interest to those trying to construct a self-sustaining device. On the other hand, as a proof for violation of CoE it isn't interesting as well because such proof has already been provided by a simpler  device allowing less leeway to critics to come up with their ridiculous objections.

Omnibus

You are a bright guy but you are also a Bright Bully you have commented on the amount of bandwidth/clutter. what purpose does that serve? Much of that was your responses to postings.

WE share Ideas and experiences here. for folks to accept or reject

YOU DEMAND account ability YOU HAVE FROM ME AND OTHERS  But I made no claims..

You might consider the value of the postings and treat them accordingly. You could also choose not to respond to them.

YOU also  have knowledge that could be useful to the group IF you choose to participate with the group it in a helpful way.

But through your words and criticims you post here create an obsticle to free thinking and new ideas, what purpose does that serve?.

This is a message from me to you and does not require a response.

Be Well
Tinker


   

[Omnibus]

But through your words and criticims you post here create an obsticle to free thinking and new ideas, what purpose does that serve?

Aggressive incompetence, hoaxing, impudent dishonesty pushed with polite arrogance, serving powers set to destroy the field etc. must be confronted vigorously. Not confronting such menace is cowardice and is exactly what?s creating an obstacle to free thinking and new ideas.