Single AA battery to light WHITE LED for long-long time

[Feynman]

Fantastic post Koen.  I will need to write more when I can sit down and study, I am at work at the moment. 

I do not think Bearden has the full picture.   But I think he probably has 50-90% correct.  The Dirac Sea was not invented by Bearden.  It was invented by Dirac . . . And Dirac shared the Nobel Prize with Schr?dinger in 1933 for "new productive forms of atomic theory".   However, I do not think Dirac had the full picture either.

Negative energy or not, we will only learn the full picture by experiment, disproving theories by methodical experimention. This is why this board is great, because people are actually doing new experiments.

Cheers,
Feynman

[Feynman]

Excerpt from Dirac's 1933 Nobel Prize lecture

One would thus be inclined to introduce, as a new assumption of the
theory, that only one of the two kinds of motion occurs in practice. But this
gives rise to a difficulty, since we find from the theory that if we disturb
the electron, we may cause a transition from a positive-energy state of motion
to a negative-energy one, so that, even if we suppose all the electrons
in the world to be started off in positive-energy states, after a time some of
them would be in negative-energy states.
Thus in allowing negative-energy states, the theory gives something which
appears not to correspond to anything known experimentally, but which we
cannot simply reject by a new assumption. We must find some meaning for
these states.

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1933/dirac-lecture.pdf

[Koen1]

Nice digging Feynman
I know the lecture but thanks for the link, now I have the pdf too.

I'd like to point out another sentence in that same passage you quoted:

Thus in allowing negative-energy states, the theory gives something which
appears not to correspond to anything known experimentally

Which is a bit of a problem if you want to prove something is really "negative energy"
and not just appears to be negative or relatively negative...
But that not a very strong argument and I know it

, but which we cannot simply reject by a new assumption.
We must find some meaning for these states.

And this is what we're doing.

Perhaps I should point out that I am not opposed to the idea of
a negative energy carrier may exist, in case I gave that impression.
I'm fine with it, I just think there may very well be a different and much
less exotic explanation for the observed "negative energy"
in the Bedini devices.
Whether or not it really is "negative energy" is not as important
as achieving over unity, I think.

[zon]

Thanks, my God.
All of u be the witness what i build.

Continue on experiment "Single AA bettery to light WHITE LED for long-long time"
The latest circuit, I have try.
I think , this is,  the longest led will lit on

See attach pict, I turn the third coil on bifilar coil as before, same length 1200 mm ( i don't count number of turn).

I forget put note capacitor on pict, there is 470 uf / 25v

Look at pict , posibbility connection:
    1.   D---F  and  E---G   
    2    D--G  and  E---F

I think , that depend on north -south of EM.
    +  for North
     -  for South

Connect north coil with single cable 1 meters as antenna (horizontal), and south to earth

I'm happy and now the battery very-very small drawn joule !

zon


(sorry.. for my poor english)

[Koen1]

Thanks Zon!

Can't wait to see some readings on that circuit

Thanks for posting your experiments, they are very interesting,
and it is good to have someone like you here.

May I ask what exactly you mean when you say
"I turn the third coil on bifilar coil"?
Do you mean to say you used three bifilar coils,
or do you mean that you've wound three bifilar
coils around one core, or do you mean to say that you've
wound three wires around one core to get a sort of
3-wire "bifilar" so actually a "trifilar" coil?
I'm sorry for the questions, but I like to get things straight.